Apparently there was a major protest this weekend, but unless you happened to be in the vicinity or walking past it, you probably haven’t heard much about it.

This past Saturday, anywhere between a few hundreds to as many as 5,000 protesters (depending on the source) flooded into Manhattan for Occupation Wall Street, a multi-day rally, which seeks to peacefully “occupy Wall Street” and expose the disloyal, incompetent, and corrupt special interests, which have permeated our economy and government.

Inspired by the massive public protests in Cairo and in Madrid, these protestors organized online, mostly through social networking sites, with a little help from the activist hacker group Anonymous.  For the past three days, the protestors slept in sleeping bags in a park near Wall Street at night and held demonstrations in the morning. Today will mark the fourth day of the “occupation” where hundreds still remain beating drums, waving signs and chanting slogans such as “Wall Street is our Street.” Yet the three major cable news networks have devoted little to no airtime on this developing story.

Of course, you can watch the protest live online or you can read all about the details in alternative newspapers and online news sites.  However, the mainstream media, which reports daily on the happenings inside of Wall Street have seemed to bypass all the action happening outside on the streets of the financial district.  I mean when the youth in Eygpt and Tunisia decided to stand up and say they had enough, our media was there with round the clock coverage. So what’s up with that?

Perhaps there is a logical explanation on why the mainstream press, particularly the 24 hour news stations have chosen to ignore the protest – especially at a time when animosity for the Wall Street has reached fever pitch. Maybe the numbers weren’t big enough to warrant coverage? However, similar and yet sparsely attended Tea Party rallies in Washington, D.C, which were held in support of federal spending cuts, were rewarded with generous media attention. Yet in the past few months dozens of protests against the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, killer drones, no-cuts to government spending, police brutality and other progressive causes have been carried out and I didn’t see any of those rallies getting coverage.

It’s hard to imagine that the mainstream media has been intentionally ignoring progressive causes while giving attention to the rallies of the extreme right. But consider that when a broad coalition of black activist groups, which had been spearheaded by the Nation of Islam, took to the streets to protest the bombing of Libya and raise awareness of social ills domestically for the Millions in Harlem March in New York City, there was no media attention.

The same could be said for the Israeli Tent City protest, which has been happening since early August.  Tens of thousands of protestors have taken to the streets in Jerusalem, Haifa and a dozen other Israeli cities in what they are calling a Million Man March to protest that country’s rising cost of living. And yet as bombings by Hamas makes news day in and day out in western media outlets, what is pegged as the largest demonstration in Israeli history since the Lebanon protest can’t get any place on the TV screen here stateside.

Any suppression of news is considered censorship and by ignoring antiwar and other far-left protests, not only is the mainstream media missing important stories and failing to act as the watchdog for the 1^st through 3^rd Estates, it is also propagating agendas, particularly corporate, right and centrist political agendas, which seeks to suggest that there is no visible opposition to the U.S. wars and other international and domestic policy issues.  This is why it is so frustrating for those in the far left, progressive and even the black nationalist communities, who have to sit and listen as pundits and commentators spout off about the lack of appeal for their causes within the general public when the unpublicized and unreported reality suggest something totally different.

Charing Ball is the author of the blog People, Places & Things.

by Selam Aster

Alicia Keys is two things to two different groups of people. On the one hand, she’s an amazing artist who is also a staunch philanthropist. On the other hand, she’s a great artist whose philanthropic endeavors really can’t be trusted. After all, she’s a home-wrecker.

Every time news emerges about Keys’ work with her organization Keep A Child Alive, which provides treatment and support to families affected by HIV and AIDS, it’s taken with some level of cynicism and apathy. In other words, eyes roll amongst Black folk.   Sure, her personal life is her personal life but celebrities are public citizens. It’s difficult to accept Key’s proposed image of a do-gooder when we’re led to believe that she didn’t do right in her personal life. For those who don’t know, Keys supposedly had a three year long affair with producer Swizz Beats, while he was married. Swizz eventually left his wife to be with Keys and they married in 2010.

Fortunately for Keys, the mainstream audience doesn’t have the same feelings as those who read blogs and news sites targeted to African-Americans, because white media basically didn’t cover news related to the affair.  The omission was so glaring that The Root compared how mainstream media handled news relating to Keys and the singer Fantasia, who was embroiled in her own drama.  Fantasia’s affair with a married man made headlines across People.com and Access Hollywood, whereas news of Alicia Keys’s affair was only mentioned in the Black media circuit.

Even Oprah, who questioned Naomi Campbell about the fact she was dating a married man (he’s officially separated), never brought up Key’s alleged infidelity when she had her on as a guest. So what gives? Does Alicia Keys’ have such good publicists that she can buy silence from influential reporters? I don’t think it’s too far off to believe considering Tom Cruise has successfully quelled alleged rumors for many, many years, thanks to a healthy legal team.

In any case, the brand of Alicia Keys, the sassy New York artist who gives back to her community, is tarnished in the Black community. Like Angelina Jolie, who wasn’t spared by the media and is still branded a home-wrecker, Keys (in the African-American community) will be associated with her artistry first, her infidelity second, and her humanitarian crusades last. Jolie can go on countless UN missions to third world countries but it will never erase the public’s memory as to what she did to America’s reigning sweetheart Jennifer Aniston.

There’s no doubt that she stands out from the pack with her dedication to her cause, as she continues to dutifully promote her organization. But it is unknown for how long her reputation amongst Black fans will linger and to what extent that her personal life has undermined her image as a humanitarian. But in any case, what matters is the services that are delivered via her organization and star power. Maybe, Key’s drive is partially motivated by her need to do right by us…or maybe not.

(The Fresh Xpress) — Seems like President Obama just can’t win. They want him to get more “angry” then get mad when he uses the term “kick a$”. They want him to quit overreaching into private industry, yet complain that he didn’t step in sooner to close BP’s leak. They assail him for being elitist, yet call him inauthentic when he orders buffalo wings and drinks beer. For many people Barack Obama will never be good enough, simply because he isn’t the guy they voted for back in 08′.

Read More…