All Articles Tagged "workers rights"
As this day draws to a close we reflect on the many historic commemorations that took place: the second inauguration of President Obama, the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, and, of course, the birthday and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Among the many things that Dr. King stood for was worker’s rights and economic justice. MNSBC’s blog for The Ed Show reminds us of this, with a look at the 1968 strike of Memphis sanitation workers.
Echol Cole and Robert Walker had been killed on the job in February of that year and given only a small bereavement fee by the state of Mississippi. It was one more slight against black workers who were expected to work with old equipment for little pay. It also became what MSNBC calls a “catalyst” for a strike in which black sanitation workers in the city sought to unionize.
“[T]he 1968 Memphis sanitation workers strike plays, at best, a tertiary role in the popular narrative of King’s legacy—this despite the fact that it was his last campaign, the battle which cost him his life. When Dr. King was assassinated on April 4, 1968, he was staying in a Memphis motel. The last speech of his life, the famous ‘I’ve Been to the Mountaintop’ speech, had been delivered the night before to an audience of striking workers and their supporters,” the blog says.
Ultimately, Dr. King’s great fight was for civil rights of all kinds. In a climate in which black workers were doing tough jobs for no money, this strike falls under the umbrella that covers the larger fight that Dr. King engaged in and led. But as the blog points out, Dr. King recognized the singular importance of economic equality.
“Dr. King became involved in the strike as he was working to launch the Poor People’s Campaign, an effort which would explicitly highlight the link between racial and economic justice,” writes the MSNBC blog. “He fought for union recognition because he understood racism and economic inequality as intimately connected phenomena: mutually reinforcing evils in an even larger tapestry of injustices.”
As we celebrate Dr. King, we should remember the many fronts on which he fought.
(Wall Street Journal) — On Monday, Seattle became the third U.S. city to pass legislation requiring businesses to provide paid sick leave to employees, joining Washington, D.C., and San Francisco. The Seattle mandate establishes minimum standards for paid sick time based on company size, according to the city’s official website. Businesses with between five and 249 workers will be required to provide one hour of paid time for every 40 hours worked, while larger firms will be required to provide one hour of paid time for every 30 hours worked. The law takes effect in September 2012. According to the legislation, paid sick days “promote the safety, health and welfare of the people of the City of Seattle by reducing the chances that worker’s illnesses will intensify or be prolonged.”
(New York Times) — Patricia Francois prowled the American Museum of Natural History on a recent afternoon, looking for nannies. She spotted two, with their charges, sitting in the inky gloaming beneath the famous blue whale, and zeroed in. Ms. Francois, an organizer for the advocacy group Domestic Workers United, asked the women if they were familiar with the state’s new Domestic Workers’ Bill of Rights, better known as the “nanny law.” The two nannies, both from the West Indies, shook their heads. “We have to stick together,” urged Ms. Francois, a Trinidadian, handing them pamphlets describing the measure. “What we have is people power.” More than seven months after the bill was signed into law with some fanfare, most domestic workers and their employers seem unaware of it, and its impact on the often-fluid business arrangements between the two groups appears to have been negligible, say nannies, labor advocates, state officials and others. The law is the only one in the nation to offer specific protections for domestic workers, including nannies, housekeepers and caregivers for the elderly. The result of years of ardent advocacy and political wrangling, it allows temporary disability benefits for full-time home workers, and provides redress for workplace sexual harassment and discrimination.
This week, the National Football League (NFL) and the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) are engaging in a last ditch effort to find common ground before contracts expire for current players and to save the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which is set to expire early next month.
In an unusual twist of fate, the NFL is trying to stop the decertification of the NFLPA. The NFL has filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board, arguing that a possible NFLPA’s decertification would violate the union’s duty to bargain in good faith. Members of the NFLPA have voted for decertification of their union in event that the CBA is not renewed. The move would allow the players to then file antitrust lawsuits against the NFL while potentially blocking the ability of the NFL to lock out players if negotiations fail.
The issues at hand relate to revenue shares, expansion of the season, a rookie salary cap and healthcare. NFL owners say that because of the high cost associated with the salary cap system, as well as the bad economy, they can no longer afford many of the terms within the current contract.
However, the players argue that the League is still financially healthy, thanks in part to lucrative TV revenue, great attendance and marketing partnerships. They are requesting the League to open the books to prove their financial hardship, to which the League has declined to do.
The last time players decertified the union was back in 1989 – two years after a 24-day player strike that failed to produce a contract with the NFL. The decertification triggered about 20 individual lawsuits against the League, including a threat of class action suit by former Philadelphia Eagle Reggie White, and helped to create the free agency back in 1993.
The NFL’s current labor deal expires March 3 and the union has said it expects the league to lock out players. With time running off the clock, it doesn’t look very good that a new agreement will be reached by then.
For most people, it is hard to have sympathy for the financial woes of a bunch of over-paid and spoiled millionaire athletes, especially considering that most Americans are struggling to hold on to their jobs and benefits.
But while the average NFL salary is $1.1 million, the median salary in 2009 was roughly $770,000. So, that means that even though the highest paid players can make $7-8 million per year, most players make much less than that. Not to mention, most NFL contracts are not guaranteed, so even if a player signs a contract worth $15 million for five-years, it is highly unlikely the player will ever see the full amount of his million dollar contract. Instead, the amount he makes will start low and increase each year, and odds are that the contract would be restructured or a player will be cut before it expires.