What the President’s ‘Buffett Tax’ Means for the Middle-Class

September 21st, 2011 - By LaShaun Williams

Monday morning, President Obama presented a plan for long-term debt reduction that included a tax hike for the “wealthiest corporations and richest Americans” who should “pay their fair share.”

GE Capital, which brings in billions of dollars in revenue, legally pays almost nothing in taxes. And billionaires, such as Warren Buffett, hold most of their capital in business assets which are taxed differently.

“Those who have done well, including me, should pay our fair share in taxes to contribute to the nation that made our success possible,” insisted the President. “Nobody wants to punish success in America,” he added, “This is not class warfare. It’s math.”

The plan also called for an end to the Bush tax cuts (which were designed to be temporary) for those with incomes of $250,000 or more, with the idea that increased tax revenue will enable continued funding of entitlement programs, nibble away at the national debt and pay for his stimulus jobs plan.

So, what does this mean for middle-class America?

Not much, really. Don’t expect to see any extra zeros on your bank statement.

Income and age restrictions on food stamps, housing assistance and federally-funded health care limit availability to victims of the recession who are not unemployed but drastically underemployed. Those who were truly middle-class (not just stretching a $35,000 salary to pay for an adjusted rate mortgage on a $300,000 house) do not qualify for welfare programs. Therefore, the President’s pledge not to support a “one-sided deal that hurts folks that are most vulnerable” mostly applies to the poor—a large percentage of which already qualified as poor.

Likewise, what incentive do wealthy individuals have to contribute more of their earnings to a federal government that has proven itself inadequate when it comes to managing money, especially when there is no guarantee that additional tax funds will be used properly? Republicans refuse to pass anything to credit Obama’s presidency; Democrats want to keep minorities hooked on entitlements; and, together they’ve decided what is best isn’t more important than re-election. Few are interested in paying for more Congressional dysfunction.

Job creation is the only thing that can save the middle-class and this economy. Furthermore, who puts people to work? Small businesses and corporations. Since banks won’t lend to small business owners or take chances on budding entrepreneurs with less than stellar credit, employment rests on the shoulders of Big Business. With Bank of America, the U.S. Postal Service and Best Buy scheduled to slash thousands of jobs; presumably a tax increase would further hinder job growth.

Ultimately, the “Buffett Tax” still leaves middle-class people with two choices: pig feet or chitlins.

But hey, he’s trying.

LaShaun Williams is a Madame Noire contributor and columnist whose work has appeared in The New York Times and on several other sites, including the Grio and HuffPost Black Voices. For more commentary on love, race, pop culture and politics, visit her blog Politically Unapologetic or follow her on Twitter @itsmelashaun and Facebook.  

More from StyleBlazer
More from MommyNoire

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • small biz

    As a small business owner, I find the phrase “pay their fair share” appalling, esically since a large percentage of the population does not pay taxes. The other thing is capital gaines being lower is a reward for taking a chance and being sucessful. If I took $100,000, and invested it in say a fast food franchise and created say 20-25 jobs, plus additonal property tax income for the county. Shouldn’t I be rewarded for the additonal risk that I took? There was no agency to make sure that I will get a dime of my money back. On the other hand if I worked for someone, there is a 100% chance that would get paid for the work that I put in. Federal laws are very stict about it.

    The last two years I lost about $750k, it would have been cheaper to close and keep my money and pay the taxes on it. All got from the federal Goverment was a $2,000 refund check.

    The reason the rich are a head is because they save, just look at the Desperate Housewives of Atlanta. Rich, no savings, recession, aand then their homes were foreclosed. I have parttime workers with iphones, used Benzs, etc. While I push a Honda and a blackberry. Remember I paid $750K out of my pocket, this year and next year I’ve been spending my time buying all the people that didn’t save and wernt creative to get themselves out of their own mess. If you want to pay more taxes fine donate to the IRS, I’m sure they will take the money.

  • fed up

    One thing comes to mind…………R O N P A U L 2012

  • Melissa

    The basis of this argument seems to be that if businesses base their hiring decisions on one thing: taxes. The truth, according to the business owners I know (admittedly, this is not a random sample – it's just people I know), is that hiring is based on the number of employees that a business needs. If people are buying more product, buying more services, shipping more goods – then the owners and managers hire more people to sell, stock, move and ship the products. Raising or lowering the tax rate has little to do with their hiring practices.

    Corporations are saying that the tax rate is high enough. And if they were actually PAYING the amount (35%?) that they are on paper required to pay, I would agree- that's too high. The truth, though, is that these corporations – particularly the big ones – don't pay anywhere NEAR 35%. Many pay nothing, and some actually got REFUNDS on multi-billion dollar profits (you know the money that they made AFTER paying all their employees and business expenses!). THAT I find offensive. It offends me that we pay the taxes that allow them to hire educated employees, ship product on roads paid for by the Dept. of Transportation, and are protected by the fire and police departments we pay taxes on – and claim that them having to pay anything back into the system that gives so much is "too much of a burden". If you're going to make money, you're going to invest it, whether you have to pay taxes on it or not.

    Also, on the subject of capital gains taxes: Why should people who use money they have to make more money get to pay only 15% on that income while people who use their minds and bodies to make money pay 25-30%? Why are we prioritizing the use of money to make money over using the sweat of our brow and the hard work of our hands?

    Neither party is working for the poor, neither party is working for the middle class. The only choice we seem to have left is whether they're going to make sure we have enough to eat while they abuse us. :-/

  • http://www.facebook.com/alicia.fort Alicia Sonshine Fort

    I agree. Until we hold those greed big banks and corporation responsible, there won't be any jobs and the economy won't turn over. The corporations know they have the power and choose not share the wealth i.e. jobs because it would cost them more money to create jobs. They're firing people because it brings more income in for them. And until the federal government (read democrats) realize this, conservatives and their big corps are going to continue to count dollars and look down on us "little people". . .

  • Dcarter910

    Why did you have to add the "But hey, he's trying" at the end? Smelled like sarcasm to me! Besides that, I can appreciate your break down of the current economic and political situation. What I would like to see people do is stop screaming out support for a political party which is only out to "shaft" them, but instead ask themselves;
    1. Do I vote because I believe in a Party or the actual person?
    2. Is it realistic that even if everyone pays more taxes, will there be enough money to support all social programs including the wasteful spending habits in D.C.?

    As you pointed out, asking companies to pay more taxes will only hurt the economy, especially when a company can pick up and move to China and pay peanuts in taxes. The reason why everything is the way it is now is not because people arent paying enough, but because the government is spending faster than we can make it.

    I hope no one responds to this post talking about bush,clinton, democrats and republicans because arguing about what has been done, only hinders discussion about what could and should be done both in D.C. and our personal lives to have a more financially stable lifestyle.

  • kayla

    we know this bill will not pass. he is only doing it for approval ratings because of the election. they will shoot this bill down, and Obama knows that

Get the MadameNoire
Newsletter
The best stories sent right to your inbox!
close [x]