What Is The Shame in Helping Blacks?

August 16th, 2011 - By TheEditor

"Devin Robinson"How long will Black Americans serve as sacrificial lambs? On August 4th the National Association of Black Journalists held a plenary session at their 2011 conference that consisted of Michael Steele, Dr. Cornel West, Sophia Nelson and Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed. The session stirred up a lot of engaging discussion but what stuck out to me most was a statement made by our Atlanta mayor. Though I voted for him and consider him to be a smart business man, a remark made by him at this conference severely disturbed me. Reed responded to a statement West made in reference to President Obama helping the poor. “The minute Obama tries to provide programs specifically for Blacks, he will be out of office faster than you can bat an eye…” he said.

Steve Harvey had his share of remarks on his syndicated show saying, “Healthcare reform is a plan that helps Blacks the most and we should understand if the POTUS doesn’t mention a program being directly for Black folks… he is the President of the entire United States, not president of the hood.”

What I am trying to understand is why do politicians mask helping Blacks as helping the poor, convicts and the jobless. Will there ever be a time when can we directly say, “I pour out this liquor for my black homies”, similar to when the president (or other elected official) says this program is for Native Americans (federally protected reserves, casino subsidies), Hispanic immigrants (immigration repeals, ESOL in public schools), corporations (stimulus packages), unions (protective laws for collective bargaining) or for the gay community (incorporation of civil liberties). What is the shame in helping Blacks? Is this really political progress or is it societal setback? Imagine the commander of a military unit that refuses to help remove a fallen soldier from danger, even if that soldier brought the situation upon himself? We would be outraged.

Are Blacks that soiled, infected and bastardized that a politician can’t say that a specific program, aid or relief is designed to help Black folks without committing political suicide? Are we only good enough to meet up with shady elected official at the motel but not good enough to say hi to him at a political function? These are the same persons who directly ask for the votes of Blacks. This seems as exploitive as the crooked pastor who says tithe your entire paycheck this week and you will see a doubling of your investment within a week and when it doesn’t happen, find rationale to justify them missing the mark. Meanwhile, when they asked for the money they promised an instant return by a specific deadline! It keeps the Black group poor but Black politicians economically sound and America divided.

The vast majority of national voters are White, so when we say we can lose a national political seat we are accepting that Whites dictate what is politically acceptable. However, after further assessment of this design I feel that not being able to directly assist Blacks only contradicts many of the statements made by Whites (and others) that racism is a thing of the past. I would want to believe that the majority of our country isn’t racist, so why is helping a disenfranchised group political suicide? If the educated members of the Black group who have been selected by a diverse group of people aren’t the ones to help tear down these walls of division, then who is it supposed to be?

Exactly what is it? Is it that blacks are too ugly to take to the prom, or is having a relationship with us against the religion of our country? Always a bridesmaid but never a bride? I would be the first to point out when we, as Blacks go wrong but in this case it’s hard to go against us socio-economically when there’s no justification.

If an esteemed, respected and prestigious Black politician isn’t there to help change the way people view Blacks but are willing to help change the way people view Latinos or Gays, what are they there for? We are not talking about White politicians who would feel it would lead them to political suicide because they are directly helping Blacks. There may be some patience in that area. However, we are talking about “supposed” Black change agents who are able to reverse the stereotypes that plague the Black group, cripple America and keep us racially divided and at odds!

As soon as it is time for Blacks to receive relief, our President becomes the President of the United States, which infers to me that theoretically Blacks aren’t a part of the United States. If you are President of the United States, president of a state, or president of a city then there should be no issue helping a woman, man, child, animal, Black, Jew, White, immigrant, poor, business owner, union, teacher, convict, Latino and all others because all of these groups contribute to the growth of this country.

At the end of the day we know hate is wrong in theory but so few are willing to take the step to bridge the disparities. I always say, if no one takes a chance, it leaves everyone at risk. Let’s stop feeling like being friends with the less popular people in our society is a stain to our personal repertoire because really and truly it is a stain on us as a nation.

Devin Robinson is a business and economics professor, columnist and author or “Rebuilding the Black Infrastructure: Making America a Colorless Nation.” You can reach him at devin@devinrobinson.com.

More from StyleBlazer
More from MommyNoire

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • Jeraldgainous

    i agree

  • Sistagirl

    Whatever is the matter with you people. Helping blacks? What for? They're lazy and shiftless and don't appreciate anything you do for them. In fact the more you do the more they expect you to do. Right? This is the decree from the melanin-challenged. Having a man of color in office is historic and a day I shall never forget, the election of My President Obama. But just 'cause he is president doesn't mean the melanin-challenged are gonna do cartwheels. He's "still" black. And putting one in as Commander in Chief don't mean didley to a certain contingent. They would rather see the country totally "ruined" than run the risk of giving assistance to that "balck" man.

  • Keith

    PS (again) Talk about oppression, these space restraints are ridiculous. I'm not writing War and Peace, just trying to express a thought. Sorry about all the abbreviations, and hope that the final and edited (for space)comment is readable.

  • Keith

    My view is more that politics and policies should be about ideas, and not who or what you are. For instance, anyone from any group can be a Democrat, a Republican, gay, straight, Christian, whatever. Anyone can choose what he wants to believe. You can't choose skin color. So should skin color dictate what you are supposed to believe or what group to belong to? Point is, what is America? Is is Black America and White America, or is it America?

    What "Black program" could the President propose? A program to help the poor would help blacks and whites. A program to help the rich would help blacks and whites.

    It's time for all of the country to grow up. This stupid clique mentality is not getting anyone anywhere. It's divisive, it promotes segregation, and does not promote unity among all. The question isn't "What has Obama done for Blacks?" The question is, "What have I done for me and my family?"

  • Olie

    I thought I was the only person feeling the way you have so beautifully expressed yourself. I am proud of President Obama, and will probably vote for him again but damn it, how often have I wondered why it is OK to help certain groups (specifically, Hispanics and Gays who rode in our skirt and shirt tails) and ignore the Black population. Look at all the accommodations that have specifically been made for them, with no apology. I really feel that all of these protected groups have hijacked civil rights that Blacks pushed and died for…where were these groups then? Yes some were there, but the majority of them were too busy trying to blend in and also in the background waiting on us to knock the door down, so that they could run right over us. Even our own people, find it hard to talk about what is going on within our race, without trying to include, specifically the Hispanics in the numbers to support our argument. I never hear Hispanics do the same. When they speak on issues of concern to them, their stats never include African Americans. I'm in government and have worked on several major campaigns, so I understand the political game that sometimes has to be played; however, times are too serious to not, at least, question why! And as the saying goes…if not now…When? As a black person, I am starting to feel like the girl that men date at night but don't want to be seen with during the day. I'm upset and hurt. You cannot court me around election time and expect me to be quiet and grateful the rest of the time. We deserve better!

  • DJ1969

    It's all rhetoric and deflection. Presidents and other politicians can take stands for/against women's issues, LGBT issues, Hispanic issues, and everyone else, but they never take a stand on Black issues. I think it's shameful and embarrassing for all of our so-called black leaders and lawmakers to keep using the tired excuse that they don't want to be labeled as the "politician for blacks." It's a cop out.

    The reality is that these politicians campaigns and careers are funded by the white powers-that-be, and as the saying goes "ye who makes the money, makes the rules." Helping blacks is counterproductive to the agendas of the white power elite. They need poor blacks to fund their prison projects. They need blacks to work their minimum wage jobs. It's beneficial to keep blacks poor and hopeless because cities get funding it. Keeping blacks down in the gutter is big business.

    • DLB

      YOU ARE RIGHT! PEACE.

  • http://rasberryconsulting.com Tamara R.

    I feel your outrage and agree with it, but I also have to agree with Mayor Reed's comment. He was just being a realist. That is the way this country operates and Obama would feel the sting tenfold. Politics is not really about what's right or wrong. It's about playing a game and trying to stay in the game for as long as you can. Hopefully you can make some change for the good along the way, if that's your mission, but that will definitely not happen if you talk about helping black folks. Sad truth. You made an EXCELLENT point in mentioning all the other groups that it's ok to specifically help – every people but black people. If we happen to get helped along the way so be it, but if a President says that's his goal, he may as well not even unpack.