Afeni Shakur And Whether Or Not Men Deserve Alimony

March 18, 2016  |  

Image Source: WENN

I’ve never been a fan of alimony. In this day in age, when both men and women have the ability to work and provide for themselves, I just don’t see the need. And while I think a stay-at-home mother should be compensated until she can get herself on her feet, there are far too many people who, I believe, take advantage of the system.

No one proves my point more than Gust Davis.

You may not know him by name but his is the husband of Afeni Shakur, Tupac Shakur’s mother. The couple have been married for 12 years but now, according to TMZ, Afeni wants out.

Sadly, the couple never had a prenup. And now, Davis is trying to take advantage. In North Carolina, where Shakur filed, judges are not required to divide property up 50/50. They evaluate each case to determine what’s fair.

Davis is asking for the right to live on a 50 acre ranch in North Carolina, the keys to the houseboats and the Jaguar.

But that’s not the worst of it. In addition to the property, Davis also wants alimony. Davis reported that the Tupac Estate brings in $900k a year. But after expenses, Afeni receives $20,000 a month. As a part of the divorce settlement, Davis is asking for $10,000 a month, half of Afeni’s monthly check from the estate, for the rest of his life.

Shakur has been separated from Davis for more than a year and is currently living in a houseboat in Sausalito, California.

She has also filed documents asking a judge to dismiss Davis’ alimony request.

Davis is, according to TMZ, a minister. I guess he never heard of the scripture, a man who doesn’t work, doesn’t eat.

There is something so heinous about all of this. While I don’t like alimony for anyone, it really grinds my gears when men are asking for it.

Some would call it sexist. But I don’t even think that’s the case here. It’s no secret that there is a real male privilege when it comes to not only employment but compensation for said employee. Men have always and still continue to make more money than women for equal work. It’s a fact. So Davis, and any other man married to a rich or powerful woman, should be able to provide for themselves even if that woman and her money are no longer around. You should always have your own money on the side, in the context of any relationship, in case, God forbid, something happens. The same is certainly true for women who often find themselves trapped in dead or dysfunctional relationships because they’re financially trapped.

I can’t grasp the concept of anyone, from any gender, feeling entitled to a former spouse’s money when they don’t want to be connected to that person through marriage any longer. People will argue that you become accustomed to a type of lifestyle that should continue after the divorce? Why exactly should it continue? Again, unless a man or woman has made a conscious decision not to work to stay home and raise children or keep the house, essentially working without outside compensation, why do you expect your lifestyle to remain the same when you make a serious life change like getting a divorce? The nature of divorce is at its core, a change in lifestyle. Sure, Davis might have been spending Tupac and Afeni’s money when he was married to her; but now that that connection has been severed, how dare he want to live off of a dead man’s estate, simply because he was once connected to his mother? It’s shameful.

Trending on MadameNoire

View Comments
Comment Disclaimer: Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN
  • C

    Not in this case I don’t he had nothing to do with his career and it’s from his estate. Trust and believe if you could get alimony from the estate. Men would be lined up around the block for Michael Jackson’s mom. Talk about you know Joe ain’t nothing I can take care of you better then he can.

  • Adrienne Wright

    These men are so lazy and entitiled!!!! We as women must beware of who we connect ourselves to in marriage and spiritually b/c it can affect our lives. I see more and more famous sistas marrying brothas who want alimony and support after the marriage is over. Theses men are users and liars to begin with and sistas with money need to wake up!!!

  • Nunya Bizness

    I believe in alimony but there should be time limits.

  • Bostonterrier97

    This is the law. Men have the same right to equal protection under the law as women do. I think Alimony should be abolished along with the equal division of community property being replaced by proportional division. However this isn’t the law.
    I also think that men should have reproductive rights. A woman can unilaterally get an abortion or put the child up for adoption, or bring the child to term and the guy is on the hook for whatever her decision is irrespective of whether or not he wants to be a father.
    But the law doesn’t protect men in that regard.

    So yes, women should pay alimony because that is the law.

  • !!!!!!!!!

    Like seriously…you’re not the best looking woman to begin with…why else would u think he came along ..

  • Freeloader its 4:45 Evictions

    That’s what happens when you are a “supposed” rich woman, you have freeloaders who come out the woodwork looking for a handout. The courts are full of ridiculous claims by weak men who seek compensation for it. And since not only the courts but this country period is into crippling the male order for it’s own superiority it pays them off. Frivolous financial claims and the weak culture that provides

    • Tidal on Welfare

      Panhandling a s s men and the white extremists who support them

  • Maurice Adelmon

    “e. It’s no secret that there is a real male privilege when it comes to not only employment but compensation for said employee. Men have always and still continue to make more money than women for equal work”

    BS > women own more wealth than men in the USA today. ITS A FACT.

  • MegaMan1000

    Afeni Shakur is a crackhead..I hate to say it but it’s the truth. She’s been making horrible decisions since the 70’s… It’s sad that Tupac’s hard earned money will most probably end up with a dickhead that had nothing to do wth Pac but his mother was never right mentally.

  • David

    I disagree with alimony for anyone, for any reason, period, but him being a pastor doesn’t change the fact that he is entitled to it under the law. If he’s entitled to it, he should get it. I’m a veteran and in entitled to my VA disability. The fact that I have a good job doesn’t change that. If I’m entitled to it, I want it.

  • Mrs.J

    Wow.I am thinking he was using her all along.I think he should get small payments for 6 months to a year.By then he should be able to get his money together.They don’t have kids together so he shouldn’t be getting too much more than that.

  • LOSDOG3

    And I don’t think he should get it all his life . Maybe three to five years because the money is her money from her son. But yes men should be allowed alimony also.

  • Yoli

    I think it depends, each situation is different. I think, even in this day and age, when a couple decides to have one parent stay home and that couple later decides to divorce then financial support should be given. Some people, men and women, forgo career and educational opportunities to raise children (I don’t get it but that’s their business). Those people should be compensated (alimony/palimony) until they can find a job, finish a degree, etc But I think there needs to be a limit on how long they can be supported.

    • Jae Bee

      I agree, each situation is different. Altough one of the parties may have been a stay at home parent at the time of divorce, it doesn’t mean that there may have been a point in time where they weren’t helping to support the family financially. I’ve mentioned the case of Betty Broderick in another comment on this post. She was the sole financial support for her family for years until her husband became a prominent medical malpractice attorney and decided to divorce her for a younger woman (his secretary). She was college educated, but decided to forgo a career to financially support her husband through both medical and law school and was the primary caregiver of their 4 children. By the time her husband divorced her she was a middle aged stay at home mom. It would’ve been quite ridiculous for her to attempt to start a career to support herself when her ex husband now had millions–made possible by all the years she had sacrificed for their family. In situations like hers I think people should be supported for the rest of their life. After all, she gave up her life so that her ex-husband could have a prosperous one that would one day benefit the entire family.

  • Vana

    Yes men deserve alimony but only if they cooked for the family, cleaned the house, did the laundry, took care of the children while forgoing looking for a job and not sitting around with Playstations or Nintendo. Since we know most men would never do any of this housework, the answer is no. Laziness is not entitlement.

    • Lisa

      You need to find some better men.

      • Kory Green

        Or she could be fair and tell the whole truth.

    • Kory Green

      I know women who don’t do those things, either and they get alimony.

  • Annamuffin

    Never marry broke people with no prospects this is what they do….

    • slim pickings for a sista

      Oh but some black women who have their crap together tend to date and marry these broke bums….

      • Annamuffin

        And that’s the issue, have standards…

  • David

    No one “deserves” alimony. If your lifestyle was the result of you being married to sometone who made thier money without you, how on the hell can you feel entitied to something you didn’t earn? If you leave a relationship with no exit strategy and no means og supporting yourself, that’s on you. Nobody should have to support somone that they are no longer married to. That’s what divorce means, that we are no longer responsible for each other.

    • Jae Bee

      What about in situations where one party had to put their career on hold in order to support the other party? There’s no better real life example than the case of Betty Broderick. She became quite popular in the 90s when she went on trial for the murder of her ex husband, a rich and prominent lawyer in San Fransisco, and his new wife. Betty married this man straight outta college, when neither of them had anything. In the beginning years of their marriage Betty was the sole financial support of the family and worked at several low paying jobs in an effort to allow her husband to attend first medical school and later law school “worry free” (and she was the primary caregiver of their 4 children). When they had finally gotten to a point in life where they could both “enjoy” the fruits of their labor, due to the husband’s prestigious medical malpractice law career, he decided to divorce her and “trade her in” for a newer/younger model. On top of that, because of his legal background he had connections and resources and the ability to manipulate the legal system to get out of having to pay her what she rightfully deserved and to control the distribution of the relatively small amount she did receive.

      Using her example, I’m going to have to disagree with you. There are people who deserve alimony—particularly if they’ve had to make sacrifices with their careers and earning potential in order to support a spouse and/or their children together.

      • David

        No, I still don’t agree with it. It’s unfortunate, but she chose to do what she did. When you marry, getting divorced is a very real possibility, just like when you start a business, there’s no guarantee that it’ll be successful and you shouldn’t be compensated for it. I’m a husband and father. If I get divorced do I get all the money I spend supporting my family back? No. I don’t expect to because I chose to have my children and to be married and taking care of them comes with being married and a father. Being married means at times you may to do more than your fair share for the family to survive. When u got married o was on active duty and my wife barely worked, a few part time Jobs here and there, nothing high paying, whole I financed her degree. So if we divorce, should I be paid back? Should she have to give me money because had I not been working and supporting her she wouldn’t have thst degree and by extension, be making what she is now? No. Marriage is an investment, and like all investments, there are no guarantees. So no, I still don’t feel like anyone deserves alimony, ever, period.

        • Jae Bee

          Marriage is much more than an investment or business and the law clearly recognizes that. Your thought process completely removes the human element from relationships and a marriage is inevitably a relationship NOT a business or a financial investment. When most people enter into marriage it is for altruistic reasons. They aren’t looking to get rich and they aren’t looking for connections or to further a career—things that you do when you start a business or make a financial investment. When people marry, they are looking to build a life with the other person which often means making sacrifices that ensures the stability and progress of the entire family. The family struggles together and should be able to prosper together. Fortunately, the law recognizes that in a “business” one partner doesn’t get to walk away a millionaire while the other partner who also “invested” in the venture gets nothing. It’s not a matter of being “paid back”, but being “made whole”.

          • David

            You’re proving my point. When you enter a marriage there’s a chance that it will end in divorce. That’s the chance you take. Anything you do in said marriage is of your own volition. I chose to marry my wife and to have 2 children. So, I don’t get whine about the money I spend providing for them, or the degree that I paid for, etc when it ends. Providing for your family is part of being married. Helping to maintain you’re family, whether that’s having a career, or being an at home parent is what being married means and no one should be compensated for doing what husbands, fathers, wives, and mothers should be doing. If the relationship ends, no one is entitled to anything for doing what they’re supposed to do. I have no sympathy for any at home spouse that choose not to work, unless they’re disabled. By choosing not to work, and have you’re own money, career, etc your are placing your fate in somone else’s hands amd no matter how much I love someone, I’d never put my well being into anyone’s hands other than my own.

            • Jae Bee

              Wow, I feel sorry for you. Your comment speaks volumes about your relationship.
              Marriage in and of itself means that you are placing your fate/trust in someone else’s hand—so if you’re married you’ve already done that despite your claims that you’d “never put my well being into anyone’s hands other than my own.

              There are in fact some states that consider the attainment of educational degrees as “marital property” thus, when a divorce occurs, the value/future value of that degree is taken into account when considering whether alimony should be awarded. You may not agree with it, but it’s the law… and once again, the law recognizes that in situations where both parties have made investments, then both parties should be able to walk away with something. You said, “If the relationship ends no one is entitled to anything for doing what they were supposed to do.” I guess you’d be alright then if you & your wife divorced and she was awarded full custody of your children and you never got to see them again—afterall, the fact that you may have been a good parent and invested in them during the marriage means NOTHING once the relationship ends.

              • David

                No, I haven’t. I was well off before I met and married my wife. If she leaves me today, I’ll be well off. Like I said, I financed her education and helped her get where she is and I don’t feel entitled to anything if we divorce because i chose to finance that education knowing a divorce was possible. I did it because I love her and wanted to help her, not because I was expected something down the road. Children and material things are completely different. I am my children’s father. Divorcing me can never change the fact that they have half my DNA and unless I prove otherwise, I will always have a right to them and will always be responsible for them. My ex wife, on the other hand, no. Divorce means we are no longer legally bound and I am no longer responsible for you, and I while I wish nothing bad on anyone, what happens to here is no longer my concern.

                • Jae Bee

                  Well, too bad for you that the law doesn’t agree with your mindset. You may be “well off” but many spouses (particularly women as it is culturally expected by society) choose to sacrifice “getting ahead” so that the entire family can eventually prosper. If you and your wife are both working and making relatively the same amount of money I’m sure that a judge who handles divorces would take that into account regarding whether alimony is necessary. Again, alimony is not to “pay [the other party] back, but to make sure that both parties are “made whole” and able to move forward with their lives.
                  As for children, it’s only been relatively recent that a father’s rights were considered when it came to custody. Legally, it didn’t matter that they have half of your DNA. Fathers were always considered responsible for their children (i.e child support) but that didn’t mean they had a legal right to them (i.e custody). For that matter, children were viewed in much the same way as material things/assets. To your benefit, laws are now changing to ensure that in cases of divorce one parent is not allowed to just walk away with the children while the other parent, who likewise invested time, money, and resources (and of course, DNA) gets left with nothing.

  • Trisha_B

    He shouldn’t get 10k a month for the rest of his life. That’s just crazy. I say, only for 6 years. Did she buy that house & car when they were together or before? He wants the property, but will he be able to afford the up keep of it? I say sell it then split the sales price…I won’t say he deserves nothing, b/c that is sexist. Then again, I am one of the few women who think other women who come up off child support & alimony is crazy & greedy lol. He should just get enough money to start a new life & get a career (he didn’t work during this 12 yrs? What he bring to the table?) But not half. He didn’t go half on making Pac whose estate he’s been living off of lol.

  • Kory Green

    If you’re going to have it, apply it equally. Men earn more, because men work more. Women take off more for family and maternity… and sometimes, they’ll take a “mental health” day. Yes, I’ve heard of women doing that.

    • caligirl

      did you mean to post this comment to this topic? lol

      • Kory Green

        Yes.

    • Lisa

      I agree. Although the first time I heard someone use the term “mental health day” it was from a guy I worked with who said he needed it because he was so stressed at work and because he lived in the “inner city of Brooklyn”, as he called it. Ever since then, I use the term from time to time to refer to a vacation day used mid-week to just chill at home. It’s a great concept, actually.

      • Kory Green

        True… but I’ve been working in corporate America for quite a few years now and I consistently see women take off work more than men. I consistently see men work longer hours than women. Work ethic is largely a personal choice. Nearly everyone I see who comes into work late and leaves early are women. This is consistent everywhere, as it is backed up by studies of workplace attendance. So they choose to earn less and to not position themselves for advancement.

        • Lisa

          I agree. In my work in Europe, for example, I am usually one of the few women who actually work full time. Here, it is very commonplace that women work part-time. (There is not so much a coming late/leaving early issue in management.)The problem is that the part timers get a bit miffed that I along with the other managers who are men (all full-timers) get all the high-profile projects, promotions, and more money, of course. They can’t have their cake and eat it too.

          • Kory Green

            EXACTLY!!!… but women in America want to have their cake and eat it, too… they want to be able to take off when they want… come in late, leave early, not put in the OT, and take maternity leave well past 3-6 months and STILL earn the same pay as men or women who do the opposite of those things. They world doesn’t work like that. You can’t get something for nothing. You make choices in life and you deal with the consequences. Your family and career both cannot have top priority. Something will have to give.

    • Vana

      So men dont take off or need a mental health day? if might be equally applied of the sexes were paid the same, but they are not.

      • beetle717

        When you account for experience, tenure, hours worked, time off, overtime, shift differential for less desirable shifts, and job choice women make slightly more than men before 30 ish and then equal out.

        • Kory Green

          Job choice would indicate different jobs, so that’s a separate issue, than “same pay for the same job.” Even in jobs overall, men make more because they are more likely to take dangerous jobs which pay more than lower level service jobs or jobs in education and healthcare, which typically women dominate… men are also more represented in STEM jobs, which tend to pay more than any other job environment in America. This is why there are so many initiatives to push girls into loving math and science.

          • beetle717

            Not really a separate issue though. The 77 cent wage gap that’s always quoted doesn’t take job choice into account. It is literally a comparison of the average of working men to the average of working women.

      • Kory Green

        People largely control their own pay by the qualifications they bring to
        the job, the salaries they negotiate, the locations they live and the
        hours they work. Women take off way more than men. That is a fact. Salary tends to depend on a variety of factors, such as education, experience, industry, regional economics, certifications and negotiation. It is also a fact that women tend to negotiate lower salaries than men. Further, it is not always a gender issue because you can have two men working the same position who are not paid the same. The same with two women. That’s usually because of those factors that I just listed and described.

  • Van

    No one deserves alimony.

    • Shelly_Shell

      UNLESS…they contributed to building some or all of the wealth then no I don’t believe in alimony. If you came in the picture and I already had anything, and on top of that, you didn’t do anything to progress us both, you deserve nothing. I don’t agree with alimony unless both partners participated.

  • ok in this case the judge should order them to divide up all the assets they accumulated while they were married 50/50 and give him one month alimony [$10.000] for every year they were married which is enough time for him to find him a church [job] and after that she should be clear of him.

  • Mr. 215

    How many famous men have been taken for half of their money all because they were married and a kid or two. Now if kids are part of it and the woman has custody, then she should get some money but not half. Get your money my dude! How many women make a living off of laying with and sleeping with rich/famous men, whose only quest in life is to marry or get pregnant by these men knowing that the end result is divorce and large part of his estate and all “he” has worked for. I don’t feel sorry for her at all, but the law protects women these days so he won’t get most of what he is asking for if any of it mark my words.

    • bkabbagej

      They don’t have any children together and He was not apart of Tupac’s upbringing, didn’t even know him, he just benefited because he was married to his mother. Now that the marriage is over, he should reap the benefits of what? Did he bring anything to the table while married to her. Usually, at whatever stage the wealth was accumulated, that’s were the division is made. If it was during the marriage then it’s usually 50% for each, if it was before the marriage, then you get whatever you brought in, that’s what you take out, unless you have a prenupe.

  • Lisa

    What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If this were a woman requesting alimony, this wouldn’t even be a story.

    • Mr. 215

      I know that and you know that and I totally agree with you, but watch someone try to defend this, in 3, 2, 1……..

    • you got that right.

    • Vana

      That is because she would have earned it with the housework she put in. Men should earn alimony in the same way, do housework.

    • Mrs.J

      I actually think when the parties are older and don’t have children together that they should get alimony for just a year.No kids are involved here.I think he used her and I think he is a minister too.I wish she would’ve protecred herself.

      • David

        I don’t think he should get anything. I don’t think anyone should get alimony period, but especially if your lifestyle was dependent on the other party. He had the money because he was married to Afeni. They didn’t build anything together so he should leave with whatever he came with. Unless you built something with someone like a business or had a career and contributed to home and thus the lifestyle, they don’t deserve anything. He didn’t contribute to anything that she had so he should get nothing

        • agreed! however considering the sacrifices a divorce spouse made to maintain the marriage, I would agree that it’s reasonable to award the less financial able spouse “reasonable” financial support as “reparation of sort” for a brief period of time say “one month of alimony for each year of marriage” no more than say “five years” depending on how long they were married but never alimony for a life time.

          • David

            I’ll agree to disagree. There’s no circumstances other maybe a disability thay will ever make alimony ok to me. If you chose to be an at home spouse, thst was your choice. You willfully put your well being in some one else’s hands. That’s like investing in the stock market and wanting to be compensated because you lost your money. Marriage is inherently a risk. Whatever you contribute to it, you do so knowing what can happen. If I get divorced, I don’t get to get back all the money I paid in order to take care of my family. I paid for my wife’s degree, but if we divorce, I don’t feel entitled to her future earnings because helping her get her education is what husbands do. I can go on and on. If you didn’t have anything when we got married you shouldn’t be entitled to anything when you leave. If we built assets together that you helped finance, then those things should be split 50/50. You have half and I have half, meaning we start out on equal footing and no one should have to pay anyone. If you have less earning potential, that’s you’re problem. I did my military service and in the process got my master’s and a job.

            • David in principle I agree with you, the hold concept of alimony came into play in civilization because typically in a marriage the husband owned the property, he went off to work and the wife stayed home had children, raised children and maintained the home, so when it came time for divorce she had no income, no means of financially supporting herself after leaving the marriage and by right no just society would allow a man to kick his wife out on the streets without any means of financially taking care of herself, and rightfully so, thus came “alimony” however society has change, and since society has changed and now husband are asking for and getting alimony the law will change also, however I still maintain in a marriage if the two parties agree upon one spouse staying home to raise children and maintain the home [which is very important] then later on down the road they decide to divorce the spouse that put their career on hold and took the financial risk for the betterment of the family unit must be compensated or made whole in some way, that’s why it should be a just formula in place for those with out a prenup to compensate the injured party, but never a life time compensation. Marriage is a contract no unlike a business contract and when one break a business contract the injured party must be compensated the same should be applied to a marriage contract. lastly there are some cases where according to their behavior and actions I think there should be no alimony or compensation for the less financially able party after divorce.

              • David

                I’m very aware of why alimony exists. But as tou eloquently put, times have changed and really ther is no need for it. I still feel like making a decision to stay home, means tou knew the consequences, so I have sympathy for you. I’m a veteranm I’ve been to combat more takes than I care to count. Being shot at was part of the job and I knew the risks and accepted them anyway. Marriage is the same to me. Like I said I knew when I got married that came with the possibility of kids and having to support them, so I don’t feel entitled to anything. I chose to marry, and ro have children, so by extension I’m choosing to support them. You shouldn’t be able to chose to stay home and then be compensated for it, I’m sorry. In this day in age, you could attend class at night when your spine comes home, there’s options for you to contribute. I respect any person, man or woman, rhat stays home with their children, but I don’t feel like you should get credit for doing what you’re supposed to do so to speak. You’re supposed to raise your family and maintain home. Like I said, I’m a veteran. I still had to be husband and and father after working 12 hour days and while being on deployment. Those obligations don’t stop, regardless of how much money and I don’t make any money for it and won’t be compensated of our marriage ends so why should she? I feel you, but I still respectfully disagree.

                • as a man, a human being in 2016 I agree with you, however I am still struggling with as a matter of principles “no compensation, no alimony or no redress” in a civilize society I don’t see how you can not have some form of compensation or redress, for example if my daughter/son stop working and put her/his career on hold to care for their children or my daughter to birth and take care of my grandchildren and the working spouse decides to part ways because they no longer what to be married anymore, I thinks as a matter of “right” and principle the spouse who made the financial sacrifice should be compensated or redress for a period of time to allow that person a chance to get on their feet but not for a life time, in other words after a divorce I do not believe a spouse should be set out or put out without any means of survival because in doing so you strip that person of their dignity and when you take away a person dignity you make that person a animal you reduce them to the level of a beast.

                  • David

                    I feel what ture saying, but my stance is still the same. When I divorce you, you are no longer my responsibility so I don’t care what happens to you honestly. I don’t wish anything bad on you, but you are no longer my concern. I made sacrifices during the marriage that I’m not being compensated for, so no, I don’t feel anyone else should either. I don’t feel anyone should be compensated for a willful choice or for doing eat needs to be done for thier family. In bussiness terms, it’s a sunk cost. I just feel like this generation people want too much credit fir things they should be doing.

                    • I agree, and this generation do want too much credit for things they should be doing by nature!

            • Sunnysideup

              What a selfish attitude.

            • Adrienne Wright

              EXACTLY!!!!! I COULDNT AGREE MORE!!!

      • Lisa

        I don’t think that anyone should get alimony, aside from those who have maybe sacrificed their own career and earning potential to support spouse/family during the marriage. This is only “news” because a man is asking.

        • you are exactly right, it’s only news because a man is asking, and because men are now asking and getting alimony things are going to change, watch!

      • agreed, your proposer is reasonable. even though I don’t think people should get alimony unless they made sacrifices [sacrifice career or put career on hold to raise children or to support the other spouse career] or contributed financially to the marriage however in this case I suggest as you did give him half of what they accumulated doing their marriage [property] and one month of alimony for each year of marriage which would equal one year of alimony, after that she should be clear of him.

  • yoda

    She knew she was making that Tupac money and didn’t get a prenup? That’s on her. The law is the law. It may be sexist to some that men shouldn’t receive alimony but with no prenup in place, the law is the law!

    • exactly however I don’t think he deserves half for the rest of him life in a case like this he deserves alimony for a period of time until he can get a job [maybe a year or two] and make it on his own.

      • Vana

        Lifelong alimony is for lazy people. Give him a year to get a job, then cut him off. If he gets a girlfriend, cut him off. Let the new girl pay for him.

        • agreed you are right, they have been married for 12 years, give him one month for each year they were married which would equal to 12 months, one year, then she should be free of him and he is on his own.

    • caligirl

      ugh, yes, that’s what’s horrible about this case. he isn’t tupac’s father and she married him after tupac’s death. he doesn’t deserve a dime but she didn’t protect herself. she either got some really poor advice from somebody or just wasn’t thinking clearly. sad.

  • A.P. Millz-CT

    I wonder if this man sits when he urinates.

    • Kory Green

      Shaming tactic to thwart equal rights.