Casey Anthony Detectives Overlooked ‘Fool-Proof Suffocation Methods’ Google Search

November 25, 2012 ‐ By Kay Hudson

Oh gosh! I think the detectives bringing this information (overlooking fool proof suffocation methods) – may be a few years too late. The verdict could have been a lot different.

According to Huffington Post:

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — The Florida sheriff’s office that investigated Caylee Anthony’s death says it overlooked a computer search for suffocation made from the little girl’s home on the day she was last seen alive.

Orange County sheriff’s Capt. Angelo Nieves said Sunday that the office’s computer investigator missed a June 16, 2008, Google search for fool-proof suffocation methods. The oversight was first reported by Orlando television station WKMG. It’s not known who performed the search. The station reported it was done on a browser primarily used by the 2-year-old’s mother, Casey Anthony.

The girl’s body was found six months after she disappeared.

Casey Anthony was acquitted of her daughter’s murder in 2011. Her attorneys argued that the toddler accidentally drowned in the family pool and that Casey Anthony’s father helped her cover it up.

tags:

Recommended For You

Promoted Content

MadameNoire Video

Comment Disclaimer: Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN
  • be real

    heck… i am surprised she didn’t blame it on a black man as they usually do.lol

  • blackpride is dead

    Duh.. this is YT amerik/k-k/a

  • snail roach

    that whole sentence was stupid. Bet that whole sentence was underlined in red before you posted it. Seriously, it’s like your brain sharted when you wrote that.

  • britt

    white people can get away with anything including killing they kids they have it so easy in life and what make it so bad she murdered this baby and didn’t admit it and still can get a job. smh thats the world we live in

  • Alicew234

    It wouldn’t have mattered. The jury wanted some “CSI” sort of proof. They had a very high standard for reasonable doubt. They wanted a witness to the crime or a confession. They wouldn’t have convicted her on this additional evidence alone.

  • CINDY P.

    wow how could the police department screw up and fail that poor child.