The Conservative In Me: I Love Obama But Not His Love For “The Poor”

October 17th, 2012 - By Marissa Ellis

shutterstock

There’s no question that I’m voting for Obama come November 6th. That’s my boo. I trust him, and I trust his character. After all, it’s his team and party that’ll be doing the job of running the country so I need to know the President has the right spirit and moral attitude when it comes to leading. But although I’m a Obama supporter, I can’t say that I don’t cringe every time I hear his party’s politics on social welfare and protecting the poor. I’m a conservative in many ways. I’m reminded of that everytime I hear Democrats empathizing on behalf of the poor. When I say poor, I’m not talking about those rendered unemployed by the current economic crisis – I’m talking about those who have taken advantage of welfare programs and free social services for the long term.

Sorry, I’m going to offend a lot of people when I say that I believe we actually should have less social services catering to the perpetually “poor.” I grew up around many people who abused the system and can sympathize with the Republican objectives of reducing social welfare services. I believe that people need incentives to work and be productive. I’ve witnessed members in my extended family basically profit from low income housing by getting paid under the table and continuing to tell Uncle Sam that they bring in too little income to provide for their families.

One of my cousins, who is a single mother, doesn’t believe it’s worth her getting off of welfare because she’s so much better off with the free access to healthcare and daycare services for her toddler that are afforded to her. If she got a job paying over $40,000 per year, she’d be easily worse off.  Come to think of it, if I were to have a child on my own today, I’d probably be worse off or on equal footing with my cousin. The only difference would be that she would have free time and free money to pursue advanced education while I continued to trudge to work every day.

I understand that there is a lot of grey areas when it comes to economics in this country but what I do feel strongly about is that the rich aren’t evil. Although Obama and his team members represent the upper class, they continue to demonize the wealthy in this country and paint the middle and low-income folks as innocent bystanders. That kind of rhetoric doesn’t resonate with me. I’m middle class but I’m not helpless. I understand how my decisions have shaped my economic standing. I would appreciate the U.S. government having my back if I were to get laid off and lose health insurance, but I certainly don’t expect Uncle Sam to compensate for my cousin’s lack of ambition and work ethic. Obviously, my ideal party would meld the principles espoused by both parties but til then…

What do you guys think about how the two parties paint the rich and the poor?

More from StyleBlazer
More from MommyNoire

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • Me

    Yet despite all the sweet deals the wealthy get, the top 1% still end up paying about 40% of the country’s federal income tax.

    • Candacey Doris

      Citation? Also, if the top 1% has more than half of the cash, how is that not fair? Not to mention that taxes are still way lower than they were 60years ago, no matter how some scream over possible tax raises.

  • Nat

    No historical or sociological perspective. Just resentment for some people you deal with in your little world. More than a tad small.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jason.f.vorhees Jason Fangz Vorhees

    the problem i think the author is not taking into account is the 3 largest groups who actually need welfare..children, elderly and handicapped. These people arent taking advantage of the system. obviously children and the vast majority of the handicapped (not including those who can actually work and provide for self) need these services. Take those services away and they will be greatly impacted in a negative way. its one of these situations where unless you go door to door for everyone getting these services to see if they actually need them you have to just shrug your shoulders and let it be.

  • http://twitter.com/MizzJazzyPeach J Mc

    I get both sides. Just like there are people taking advantage of the welfare system there are also wealthy people who are selfish and walk all over the less fortunate. There is bad and good on both sides and both need to be acknowledged. It’s like the crabs in a bucket story, we live in a society where it’s I’m gonna get mine and keep mine even if I have to screw somebody over to do it. I do believe that we all should help each other. Those that truly need the help shouldn’t take advantage of the help that is available to them, and the wealthy need to appreciate the “little” people that work for them and have helped them to grow their businesses.

  • KlassyRN

    I understand you were attempting to make a point.. but I failed to see it…. *wipes glasses* read again…. no same thing…I fail to see your point when the “rich” can use loophole to pay less taxes than I… and thats after putting not one but two children through college.. and although people view me as middle… never that.. Im 47% with the rest as I trudge to work daily.. while enjoying the time I spend with my grands on the weekend….as I watch taxes strangle the life out their existence… and sit here pondering should I obtain another Masters more readily suited to my field of expertise so that I can continue to support them in any manner necessary and up my portfolio in the process seeing that at retirement I may be on my own.. bc I refuse to be a victim to the system or my children but watch thousands of dollars escape my salary every month…
    I’ve had enough of the crabs in the barrel and the ones who get out and now wants everyone to find their own way.. Im so done.. better yet why not just scratch Romney and President Obama off the ticket and vote for big bird….

  • Nikki

    If I have to pee in a cup to get a job, then so should those who receive government assistance. I get that many people who use government assistance programs need them, and be worse off without them; but life is about challenges, struggles, and sacrifices.

  • clove8canela

    I do agree with your point on reforming social services. Too many people are taking advantage of the current system we have in place. Welfare, as I see it, should not be used as a source of income but rather temporary assistance, a means to what will hopefully be a self-sufficient end. I am a card carrying Democrat, but to really take it to the next level, I think welfare recipients should be required to take birth control, so that I as the taxpayer do not have to support babies 4, 5 and 6.

    I feel this way about public housing as well. This should be a temporary housing arrangement –not lifetime housing- until said party is able to get back on their feet. Although it can be said that there’s not enough incentive being provided with these services to help those in need become financially independent, I also think that it should be reformed in such a way that those on it, would want to get off it as soon as possible.

    Everyone may need a hand up at some point in time, but reform needs to be implemented for those who feel entitled to sit on their bums and have/make babies while I work everyday and pay taxes to keep them in the lifestyle they’ve grown accustomed to.

  • Angel

    People who think just like this author are a reminder of why we had the president before the one we now have. Why not take your issues up with your lazy relatives, instead of ranting about them here? (Or mind your own business works too) Everyone who is receiving or has received public assistance are not your relatives.

  • Monica

    This author is funny to me. Surely she didn’t base an entire argument off her relatives actions when her relatives represent less than 1% of the population as a whole! I know plenty of people hustling TANF like a back alley crap game but I don’t automatically assume that everyone on TANF is full of it. There are plenty of people who were laid off from companies like ones Romney shut down who are now part of the welfare lines and they never had any intentions of being there. All it takes is for a set of bad circumstances for any one of us to be “poor”. I go to work everyday and have been since I was 15 paying right into FICA. If I become unemployed I like others would expect a return on our “investment” in FICA. It’s easy to throw stones when you’re throwing them blindfolded, but its better to take the blindfold off and aim at the ones who are guilty or don’t throw at all.

    • mac

      ^beautiful *slow clap*

    • Angel

      I agree. Many people complain about others who are on welfare, when welfare is a drop in the bucket compared to other debts of this country. It’s not the “poor” people who are putting this country in debt. Most of the rich are tapping out every source they can to keep what they have and acquire more in the process.

      • Oops

        Not so sure about that drop in the bucket theory. It was just reported that state and federal welfare expenditures topped $1 trillion in 2011.

  • rene12

    What about the children of these “lazy” poor adults? The fact is that most people are not like your cousin and really do need the help. You are generalizing a whole class of people off of your cousin and a couple people in your neighborhood….which is sad.