Norton Plays Russian Roulette with D.C.’s Future

July 7th, 2010 - By TheEditor

"Yvette Carnell"In a 5-4 decision on June 28th the Supreme Court struck down Chicago’s ban on handguns.  Chicago mayor Richard Daley was left shaking his head.  The previous week had been an exceptionally bloody one with 54 people shot over a single weekend.  His distaste could be felt by many across the country. DC’s delegate to the House of Representatives, Eleanor Holmes Norton, saw it quite another way.  In a June 30th press release she praised a decision that “appears to vindicate and to sanction gun laws like the District’s new and revised gun laws”.

She has some ideas for controlling guns but nothing so ambitious as to actually get them off the streets.   She may not be the champion of the gun lobby, but she’s shown herself to be accommodating.  Here’s their current bargain:  D.C, if you desire representation, Eleanor, if you actually want to cast a vote that will be counted, then you must be willing to sacrifice your community in exchange.

Attached to the D.C. voting rights bill is what’s commonly known as a poison pill. In this case, it’s a provision which would weaken Washington D.C.’s gun control laws by repealing restrictions on semiautomatic weapons, loosening registration requirements for guns, and ending criminal penalties for owners of unregistered firearms.

The gutting of the D.C. voting rights bill highlights both the power and perniciousness of the National Rifle Association (NRA). This war profiteering company – which operates under the auspices of a Second Amendment rights organization – has single-handedly hallowed the Second Amendment and inserted the camaraderie of southern brotherhood in its place.

Their success is largely due to a seismic fraud perpetrated by the gun lobby which pushes the fantastical tale that the right to bear arms is a long standing freedom which should be blindly cherished by all Americans. Thus, gun control advocates are enemies of freedom (heard that before?) whose efforts must be thwarted at every turn.  This would be a valid point, if true.

In order to fully understand why the attempts to thwart gun control legislation are folly, let us begin by tracing it from inception. Gun control laws were initially instated by the beneficiaries of slave labor who were petrified at the idea of freed blacks defending themselves against the most vile domestic terrorists in American history – the Klu Klux Klan. Yes, gun control largely began at the hands of those who now dare us to pry the glock nine from their cold, clenched fists.

And just as the former slave owners lived in fear of retribution from those who they’d abused, many of us live in fear of being mowed down by a gang member with an AK-47 and a grudge. The NRA would suggest that I buy my own gun and shoot back but being in the midst of crossfire has never been a dream of mine.  I would prefer that the semiautomatic weapon be removed from the market in the first place so that the disgruntled and confused young man doesn’t have access to it.

But, the attempts of most gun control advocates to negotiate and triangulate the gun rights issue in an effort to afford people freedom while implementing common sense controls has always met with rigid defiance from the NRA.

Truth be told, the NRA doesn’t wage war on behalf of the Second Amendment, but on behalf of those who earn a fortune selling automatic weapons to young boys in war torn African nations, and their kin right here in America.

If you need proof, just glance at the Second Amendment which reads as follows: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Under the leadership of the NRA, the Second Amendment, intended to protect Americans from tyrants, has been perverted to fatten the very entities who the founding fathers sought to protect us from.  The District of Columbia is just the next in a long line of counties, states, and individuals who’ve fallen victim to the empty rhetoric of the NRA and their confused supporters.

Eleanor Holmes Norton is now allowing gun ownership of all types, sizes, and varieties for every man, woman, and child who currently reside in the District of Columbia in exchange for a right which should’ve be granted long ago. Ms. Norton has announced her support for the voting rights bill but the outcome remains unsure. In more ways than one, Norton is playing Russian roulette with the city she claims to love. Let’s all hope that the chamber is empty.

Yvette Carnell is a former Capitol Hill Staffer turned political blogger. She currently publishes two blogs, Spatterblog.com and GoGirlGuide.com.

More from StyleBlazer
More from MommyNoire

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • paul berio

    Here is some interesting facts. Please do some homework before you write another article like this

    Lets do like the rest of the World

    Subject: Gun Control

    Interesting Lesson In History ….

    Whether you agree or not, it's an interesting lesson in history.

    Something to think about…

    In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

    China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated

    Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.

    It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

    The first year results are now in:

    Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent

    Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent

    Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent

    (yes, 44 percent)!

    In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.

    (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!)

    While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

    There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in "successfully ridding Australian society of guns." The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

    You won't see this data on the American evening news or hear our president, governors or other politicians disseminating this information. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.

    Take note my fellow Americans…..before it's too late!

    The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson. With guns, we are citizens. Without them, we are subjects.

    If you value your freedom, Please spread this anti-gun control message to all of

  • paul berio

    Here's a thought impose a moratorium on all gun control laws and teach everyone how to use a gun to the point of it being 2nd nature and then see if your Chicago criminals are so anxious to start shooting at people. I'm not a criminal or someone with a death wish but some how If I was inclined to shoot at people I sure would think twice about it if I thought there was a chance that they might shoot back.

  • Pingback: Norton Plays Russian Roulette With D.C.’s Future | Cribs (Cri.bs)

  • Pingback: Norton Plays Russian Roulette With D.C.’s Future | Hell To Da Naw!

  • Keshia

    Like so many posters have stated the article is not accurate. First of all the Supreme Court did not vote down the ban, they sent it back to the lower court (remand). In theory one could say it was a vote against the handgun but that would not be an accurate legal depiction. Also, I won't get into the other information there are so many holes in this article. Perhaps the ATL Post should consider hiring legal experts to write for them…I mean even law students would be better than this.

  • Robert

    Who does gun control really affect? The people who actually obey the laws to begin with. If criminals obeyed the laws they wouldn't be criminals would they?

  • Kyle Mitchell

    the author is wrong.I have been a victim of violent crime and in both situations had i been armed, i would not have been the one in the hospital. criminals dont just use guns, they find bats, knives, and attacking in groups just as brutal and effective.I now have a conceal and carry permit and never leave the house without a gun.

    If a criminal thinks there is a good chance he will be harmed during his unsavory actions , it is unlikley he will perpetrate these actions.No one robs gun stores.

  • lramsay

    The facts in this article are outdated; Del Norton actually killed the voting rights bill so as not to compromise the District's laws and safety. So @sabrinavonbach, you are correct that much of the article is BS, but not that it is typical of liberals. Bad reporting can come from either end of the political spectrum. This article is poor because it was not thoroughly researched or fact-checked, not because it's liberal.

  • sabrinavonbach

    Are you just a complete idiot or just a poor liar. Since when does the NRA represent the interest of gun dealers supplying automatic weapons to African children? Please name one. Just one manufacturer. You can't. Here's a hint of the right answer. The weapon of choice for African child soldiers is the AK 47 and they're made in Russia and China and sold by their citizens or other foreign nationals. OBTW name a single US or for that matter European manufacturer or distributor who sells fully automatic weapons to "the kin" ( whatever that means ) to African Americans. Just one. In fact your whole article is pretty much total BS when you look at the real facts. So typical. So liberal.

Get the MadameNoire
Newsletter
The best stories sent right to your inbox!
close [x]