Street Lit Debate: Does Urban Fiction Undermine the Black Canon?

July 26th, 2011 - By TheEditor

Urban Fiction: The Street Lit Debate“Representing the race” remains a prickly issue in black literature

By Nana Ekua Brew-Hammond

In the 40-plus years since Robert “Iceberg Slim” Beck released Pimp, the audience for so-called “street literature” has remained faithful to the genre, making bestsellers of Beck’s contemporaries and successors like Donald Goines, Omar Tyree, Teri Woods, and more recently Sister Souljah. But in 2008, after penning 16 novels, Tyree dramatically retired from the genre via a blog post.

“I’m done with writing all urban fiction,” he wrote, lamenting what he said was the “[urban audience’s] love for grit, crime, sex, broken hearts, drama, and other bullshit.” Calling his own work “urban classics,” Tyree juxtaposed street lit against what he termed “responsible lit.”

This debate rages on in the field of black publishing today. Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, and James Baldwin represent the African-American literary canon with their musings on race, feminism, and sexuality, while so-called “Street Lit” continues to occupy a controversial, but commercially successful spot in the hearts of African-Americans. Though most of us fall somewhere in the middle in reading preferences, the anxiety commonly felt about this contrast is not so much about the poles themselves, but distress over being defined solely by “low culture.” Centuries of being stereotyped will do that to a people.

Leading authors in this field see this struggle between telling gritty tales and promoting laudable writing as more complicated than judging street lit as all bad — or good.

Torrey Maldonado, author of Secret Saturdays does not appreciate the distinction of this label at all. “I’ve heard people call [the genre] ‘street lit’ and it kind of discredits the type of literature that it is,” he told The Atlanta Post. Maldonado, whose book is set in Brooklyn’s Red Hook Housing Projects, adds: “Although Secret Saturdays is set in an urban environment, it deals with universal themes… You can’t say because a black boy is on the cover of the book, that this book is only for black people.”

But that’s exactly what many people assume, says author David L who does not publish under his full name because he wants to keep his identity as an author separate from his role as head of the company Total Package Publications. “That’s one of the reasons I don’t even put my picture on the back of my book,” L explains. “I want to be known for the type of fiction I write, not because I’m an African-American author who wrote about a specific subject matter.”

More from StyleBlazer
More from MommyNoire

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • Pingback: Self-Publishing Finally Gets Its Respect « people who write

  • Wolfgang Smith

    The street lit debate reminds of the “gangsta rap” vs. “conscious rap” debate of the 90s.

    If MORE Black readers supported Black authors from OTHER genres, we wouldn’t have articles like this.

    Real talk.

    It’s a double edge sword because hood books are a form of escapism while others books from different genres are ignored by the Black demographic for the most part.

    It boils down to the purchasing habits of the reader…we live in a capitalistic society…if readers want more of a variety from Black authors, they should SUPPORT the alternative instead of complaining.

  • Itsthatgirlz

    I agree with Roy. My big problem with urban/street lit – I call them hood books – is that there are too many of them that are terribly written. Its not worth the effort to pick through all the trash that gets published to find the gems. I feel like a big problem is when the books get self published, they don't go through the editing and rewriting process, which are the most important parts of writing. I admit, the subject matter isn't my favorite, but every once in a while I can get into it, if its done well. Its just too hard to find it done well among hood books.

  • IHateRealityTV

    In my opinion, I think the so called "street lit" can be repetitive in the story lines, but if done correctly can be just as entertaining and thought provoking. My grief is not only the repetive story lines but more so the lack of originality. I dont think that African American writers should remove themselves from this genre, but they def. should focus on doing it in a different way. Im one of those people who would read almost anything and I never limit myself to a certain style of writing, genre, specific writers (african-american), but some do. I think "street lit" is away to get people into reading period.

  • NoReally

    It is what it is…at least black folks are reading. ..lol…admittedly I love my “street lit” but sometimes it does start having the same story lines…girls who love thugs who love drugs and guns….but I love me some chunichi, teri woods, noire, danielle santiago, and ashley and jaquavis, etc

  • Fulcrcle

    I agree with you Roy. Whether I'm walking in a brick and mortar bookstore or browing e-books for my kindle, the market is oversaturated with the same urban fiction themes. They're all about drugs, drug dealers, designer clothes and dime pieces. The grammar and editing is horrible! These books are only worth 99 cents and I refuse to purchase them period! I have stopped looking at these books and moved toward non-fiction and African American paranormal just to get away from it.

  • http://www.roypickering.net Roy Pickering

    Does Urban Fiction Undermine the Black Canon? Yes it does somewhat because there is so much of it, with a high percentage of it not being very well written. If there was balance to what was being published that would be fine. So called Urban Fiction would be but one genre among the mix, if not adding much to the canon then at least not subtracting from it. But if the vast majority of books by black authors put out each year are a) poorly written regardless of whether self pubbed or not b) covering a pretty narrow range of subject matter, and c) the range of topics consists of nothing particularly positive, thus reinforcing negative stereotypes, basically gangsta rap hip hop videos in book form, then this is a problem in need of fixing. I don't fault the authors though. They're just hustling to make a dollar out of 15 cents. The mainstream publishing industry needs to get its head screwed on right. But I don't totally fault them either because money talks. The major industry players will publish what people are buying and reject what people are ignoring regardless of quality/merit.

    • Royal Chocolate

      You are correct but I just love reading these.

      And not just this type of stuff, I just finished Isabel Wilkerson's The Warmth of Other Suns so my literary interests vary. But like you said, "money talks."