Why PETA Is Welcoming Waka Flocka Flame and Other Black Celebs To The Animal Rights Movement

February 10th, 2011 - By TheEditor

"Charing Ball"Waka Flocka Flame, trap-rap superstar and possessor of one of the worst names in hip-hop history, believes in going Hard in the Paint – for the ethical treatment of animals, that is.

Yes that’s right. Mr. Ole Do it (Oh, Let’s Do it) has just been signed as a spokesperson for PETA’s (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) new celebrity activist campaign, “Ink Not Mink.” Flame, born Juaquin Malphurs, is certainly taking his new position seriously; recently, he stated in an interview with XXL Magazine, “animals should be treated the same as you would a kid. Would you want someone just to walk up and skin your kid? Hell no!”

Good point.

However, the skeptical side of me initially believed that perhaps this newfound kinship with God’s furry little creatures was nothing more than a publicity stunt meant to defer attention away from his admitted lack of lyricism and his embarrassing appearance on BET when he boorishly declared that, among other things, “Education Good.”

But a quick Google Image search didn’t turn up any pictures of Flame in fur coats or hats, which could possibly mean that this is a legit cause for him. Waka will now join a short list of black celebrities who have embraced the animal rights movement in some shape or fashion, including Alice Walker, Russell Simmons, Dexter Scott King, Angela Bassett and Miss Black USA Elizabeth Muto.

Hmm, Waka Flocka Flame and Alice Walker in the same sentence? I never thought I would see that happening.

Nevertheless, Flame isn’t the only black celebrity freshly tapped by PETA.  Taraji Henson recently posed nude for PETA’s signature campaign, “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur.” According to Henson, among her reasons for lending her own flesh to the campaign was a belief that suffering and fur goes hand in hand. She explained to PETA, what if someone said, ‘Black skin is the new fur?’”

When comes to advocating for the ethical treatment of animals, blacks on the grassroots level are noticeably missing. When it comes to issues that blacks are most willing to fight for, animal rights are somewhere on the bottom of the list. This is why this campaign by PETA is very interesting, because it seems willing to address the unspoken question of why such a noble cause as ending unethical treatment of animals is devoid of people of color.

Part of the disconnect has to do with the philosophy of the practitioners of animal rights, who stress that the battle for animal rights is akin to human rights campaigns such as ending slavery and the black civil rights movement.

But for many African Americans, who continue to struggle immensely to prove their own humanity, there is a sentiment that the suffering of animals evokes more empathy from white folks than does the suffering of black people. Moreover, the history of oppression that our ancestors faced has been hijacked to promote an agenda, which seems to reinforce the notion of just how trivial our humanity remains to the rest of society.

More from StyleBlazer
More from MommyNoire

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • ray

    Peta “cares” about animals? They despise human beings – they’re a misanthropic animalworshipping cult! If they had their way, everyone would be forced to become vegetarians (they don’t endorse this out of any concern for human health, but only to “protect” animals), wearing fur and
    leather would be outlawed, medical research using animals (which has led to cures for any number of diseases) would be stopped – again, they have no concern for people, only animals, who they view as superior to humans. Their founder, ingrid newkirk, is famous for saying “a rat is a cat is a dog is a boy” – this reveals her anti-human way of thinking. Also, she’s on record as saying if a cure for HIV could be found and animal testing would be involved, she would oppose it! They want black support? After the way these insane fanatics treated michael vick? They’ll never get mine! The majority of whites are turning against them, that’s what really driving this. And for you pet owners, peta wants that banned too (they compare owning a pet to slavery, an insult to our ancestors as well as the millions of people languishing in slavery all over the world today). Nuts and fanatics – why should we support them? “Oppression is oppression?” NO, its not! The oppression of HUMANS comes first! If you’re human and you hate your own species, what’s the solution? Suicide?

  • Jack

    But the playing field is not level. While the right to live is basic and essential, the right to survive is not. Nature organizes our world in a very distinct hierarchy that demands the sacrifice of life by certain species. For the purpose of discussion, if we are all equal—human and animal regardless of race, creed, or genus—by who’s standard do we live, humanity’s or animal’s? Do we expect animals to engage philosophical concepts that their minds cannot process or do we as humans devolve into some feral, primal state. We are all in agreement that cruel, and I realize that word’s subjective nature, treatment of animals is morally wrong, but I doubt a hunting lioness on the Serengeti will ever consider a zebra’s basic right to live.

    • TerryWard

      We would politely ask Jack what "a hunting lioness on the Serengeti " has to do with this.

      • Jack

        Jason wrote, "the most basic right is the right to live. I feel animals have just as much right to live as we do,"–with his reference to "we" obviously pertaining to humans. He further argues, "…part of the problem stems from, and [sic] people view themselves as being above animals." From these statements, I gather that Jason believes that humanity and all animals should be placed on equal footing with respect to an unalienable right to live. I agree that animals have a basic right to live–to the point that no creature should be hunted to the point of extinction nor intentionally eradicated (without just cause) from the face of the earth. But I find the premise that, “we all deserve the same basic rights and freedoms” inconsistent with nature. How can the “natural right” that all humans and all animals possess a basic right to live exist if animals do not possess the capacity to respect such a right? Does prey possesses the same right to live as the predator? And if so, does the predator violate that right when they kill the prey? That is what a lion on the Serengeti, or any predatory in any ecosystem, has to do with this.

        P.S.
        I appreciate the civility of your response

  • Ikeepit100!

    F*** PETA! They were more worried more about animals rather than human beings during Katrina.

  • John Duggins

    "folks of color have for centuries had their own set of standards when defining what is and is not ethical treatment of animals."
    That's just getting silly. PETA wants people to change how they treat animals. White folks, blacks, etc… Why would PETA honor poor treatment of animals just because a black person did it? I think it's good that PETA isn't trying to just reach white people.

    • Jack

      I believe the author’s reference to “centuries old practices concerning the ethical treatment of animals,” primarily deals with aspects of certain cultures in which consumption of animals and animal products were necessary for sustaining their societies—for example, Central Plains Indians and their use of bison or the importance of cows in Central African cultures. These societies certainly killed animals, but their methods were not uniquely cruel and certainly did not rise to the level of vivisection—certain cultures even thanked the animals for their sacrifice and prayed over the animal before dismemberment. The issue with PETA is not their proscribed goal of ensuring ethical treatment for animals, which is a noble endeavor, but their instance that their definition of what constitutes ethical treatment be designated as the standard, and anyone that does not conform to that standard be relegated to some amorphous category of ignorant, savages or sociopaths.

  • TerryWard

    Who says we have to 'chose' ?
    Compassion is compassion.

  • Paul D

    The point is not to demean African-Americans but to promote understanding about animals. It's a valid comparison.

  • Rissa

    His name is Juaquin Malphurs

  • wiki fliki

    I think a lot of people don’t want to stand up for animal rights because of PETA. PETA is an opportunistic group who are extreme and like to get publicity. Their views are usually skewed. I’m all for animal rights but I don’t support PETA.

  • Whitney

    Animal rights, racism, class welfare, sexism…it's all related. Check out what Alice Walker has to say about it.

  • Halle's Berry

    Wocka is the ultimate coon and PETA wants to laugh. #thatisall

  • Jason

    This is an interesting perspective and a worthy read. It has made me curious how many black people feel slighted by the animal rights movement, because the thought had never occurred to me that they might feel taken back by it. Perhaps I'm too much of an idealist, but I would imagine that the oppression black people have faced would give great insight into the oppression animals face, if not empathy. How would somebody be able to fight for their own rights and not somebody else's?

    Seeing people fight only for their own rights and not those of others reminds me of Niemoller's writings..

    First they came for the communists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

    Then they came for me
    and there was no one left to speak out for me.

  • Nana

    I like Wocka flocka and I think this is a good look….

  • Kimberly

    well said. and true

  • Courtney

    um the ad he was supposed to be featured in was cancelled so this article is late and useless

    • Charing Ball

      At the time this article was written, he was suppose to be featured in the ad. And unless you have some exclusive, breaking news to share with us, I am still not seeing where his appearance in the campaign has been rescinded. And as I am posting this comment, the announcement is still listed on his official site: http://www.wakaflocka1017.com/news/

      Furthermore, Waka Flocka and the likes, are only used to illustrate a broader point about the animal rights movement and its connection/disconnection with the African American community. If this debate doesn't appeal to you, that fine. There are plenty of other topics on this site, which I think you will find more to your liking. But I don't believe its a useless discussion to have in the least.

      • Dariush

        Cry me a river! He's a disgrace.

Get the MadameNoire
Newsletter
The best stories sent right to your inbox!
close [x]