Understanding The Frenzy Over Vick and White Folks’ Love of Dogs

January 3rd, 2011 - By TheEditor

"Charing Ball"So Tucker Carlson, Fox News commentator and professional agitator, recently ignited a small controversy over his comments that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Michael Vick should have been executed three years ago when convicted on dog-fighting and animal cruelty charges.

As a Philadelphian, and needless to say Eagles fan, no one is happier than I (and the millions other Eagles fans around the country) to have a player like Vick leading the helm.  But even through his redemptive professional comeback, Vick still can’t escape the calls from animal rights activist and dog owners alike that he should have been stripped of his freedom and barred from the game forever.

This constant barrage of hate towards the quarterback is alarming for some, particularly in the African American community, who find it odd that dogs in America have been elevated to a higher standard than many humans.  All this resentment has led some in the black community to raise the pentacle question: Why do White people love dogs much more than they do Black people?

Even the humorous site, Stuff that White People Like, has lightly mocked the peculiar relationship between white people and their dogs, which involves feeding them organic and homemade foods, talking to their dogs; giving them human traits and characteristics, dressing them in cutesy designer outfits and even kissing them on the lips – ewww.

This strange kinship that white folks have with their dogs, some believe, is only contrasted with black folks relative obliviousness to the furry four legged creatures. For some, it’s straight up dislike. Some say its goes all the way back to slavery and the Jim Crow South when dogs were used as weapons to keep us Negros in check.  Many black folks seem to not be able to erase those images from their mind of young black men being mauled by a racist dog, egged on by a truck full of angry rednecks.

But all jokes aside, this is not necessarily a black and white issue for me and I think to frame the issue this way does a disservice to our humanity as black people. I know some whites who hate dogs and other domesticated animals as much as anyone else. And yet I have black friends, who not only love their dogs but have birthday parties and even dress them up in little stupid outfits (seriously, stop that).  Folks, who love, hate and abuse animals knows no colors or bounds.

As an owner of a 110-pound American Bulldog named Coltrane, it can be safely said that I belong to the group of black folks who too love dogs (and cats too) – although I am not at the point of dressing him up in little fu-fu outfits. However, growing up, I always had a healthy relationship with animals and was taught that God didn’t reserve the ideal of respect for life to just us humans.

Likewise, I didn’t have a problem with Vick’s conviction and subsequent punishment for the crime of dog fighting. Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”  And to breed dogs for the purpose of fighting and then electrocuting and drowning the losers because they didn’t fight ferociously enough, is not civilized or reflective of humanity.

However, Gandhi also said that, “The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.”  Vick has served his time and did repent through volunteer work with the Humane Society of America, where he regularly goes to speak to kids.  And if the president of the Humane Society feels that one day, Vick could be a loving owner to a dog – one day, than what does any of this have to do with football?

Yes, there are black folks, who love our dogs just as much as any human on the planet. And no, we can’t easily chalk up Vick’s past indiscretions to the notion that “they were just dogs.” However, we do believe that the narration being played out in the media needs to change from Vick, the dog fighter, to Vick, the man who has and continues to pay his debt to society and is now on the amending path.

The reality is that this phony outrage over Vick’s past treatment of dogs has little to do with the crime that he had been convicted of but more likely a reflection of the deep-seeded racial prejudice of black men with money. The same, so-called dog-loving activist Tucker Calson seemingly has no problem with Sarah Palin and her helicopter moose shooting expeditions.

Charing Ball is the author of the blog People, Places & Things.

Madame Noire Video

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • Laura

    Seriously, you think the outrage over Vick's past treatment of dogs is "phony" and is based in racial prejudice. Ask any dog lover, rescue worker, animal rights activist, etc. if there wouldn't be equal disgust and outrage if Tom Brady had eloctrocuted and drowned and slammed dogs to their death. And by the way, if you're going to write an article about something, do your research first . . . Vick didn't serve one day in prison for animal cruelty. He was convicted and served a sentence for bankrolling a dog fighting operation. So in fact, he has not done time for his crimes. And I don't know how much psychology you know, but Vick most likely isn't a reformed animal abuser. He's most likely a sociopath putting on a very good facade of remorsefulness. You can't spend years torturing and killing dogs with your own bare hands, and even using your own personal pets as bait, and then in 18 months be a changed man. There is something deeply, terribly, horrifically wrong with your psyche and that doesn't get fixed in 18 months, if ever.

  • retiti

    im glad youre ok with the punishment he got for animal abuse. which, by the way, was none. THAT's what people are still mad over. he could be purple for all i care, hes still scum, the laws are scum, and whoever let him plead out and serve no time for animal abuse is scum.

  • texasJen

    Carmen, you are SO right! Thank you for saying that! Black people can be just as racist.

  • TexasJen

    Are you KIDDING me? This article disgusts me and infuriates me more than I can handle right now.

    I can tell you that us animal advocates do not like this man because of his actions, NOT his race. Plain and simple. His gruesome actions make his an ugly and unforgiveable human being. He can rot in hell for all I care.

    God told us specifically to take care of the animals he gave us. I will go to my grave hating those that exploit and kill animals inhumanely and for pure sport- Vick and Palin included.

    As a minority myself, Im soooo damn tired of people playing the race card. Seriously, get over it people. It was in the past. There is nothing we can do about it but keep learning. Yes, there still is racism but I think it is articles like these that push us back instead of propel us forward. When people keep using race as an excuse, we’ll continue to get nowhere.

    I stay away from people that don’t like dogs or children- period.

  • L Carpenter

    Problem is Vick was not punished for his crime…he went to jail for illegal gambling, not dog fighting or animal abuse, second if his latest interview with GQ is anything to go by, he is anything BUT remorseful. Lastly doesn't anyone have ANY concerns over the depravity that it takes to torture a dog? Lets face it folks, stealing is wrong..what he did goes well beyond sick and disgusting

  • LIeslgee

    It is insulting to suggest that I don't care for Mr. Vick because he is a black man who has money. Really? My issue with Mr. Vick has to do with battery cables clipped to dogs' ears and then throwing them into a swimming pool. That isn't dog fighting. That is the torture of an animal and it has not been addressed by anyone — not by Mr. Vick. Not by the charges against him. Not by the Court.

    I'm still waiting for a reasonable answer about that. That it's just something in the "black culture" is not an acceptable answer. He is carefully not addressing that issue. And it really doesn't have anything to do with his color. Really.

  • Dawn Marie

    Black or white, whatever. This isn't about color, this is about how someone mutilated other sentient beings with no remorse. If Vick had killed say, a bunch of women or children the same way – drowning, electrocuting, strangling, he would a) not be out of prison and b) certainly not held on a pedastal. He would have lost his rights and respect, plain and simple. Do you have respect for serial killers? Seeing dogs, cats, {name your domesticated animal}, as "owned" objects rather than treating them as beings that we are their guardians is doing a disservice not only to the animals, but to our moral fiber.

  • Coinneach

    I'm not even especially fond of dogs (sorry, everyone, I'm a Cat Guy to the bone) but thinking about what that evil SOB did makes me physically ill. It's nothing to do with race or species, it's about Not Being An Evil SOB. So he can play a game (it's a GAME, people, get you some perspective!) and make everyone feel sorry for him: y'all are being played like violins.

    Also, are you apologists really not aware that he was NEVER charged, tried, or convicted of the cruelty charges? He did 18 months for racketeering. His murdering of helpless animals never came into it.

  • Hannah Konnoff

    Wow. I would say I'm offended by this blog, but that would be like saying Michael Vick was inconvenienced by his conviction–oh wait…. He was inconvenienced, and not much more (and certainly not remorseful, he's made that patently obvious).. Guess what. He got off extremely lightly for a horrific crime because he's a rich sports figure. And I abhor that because I do love dogs as much as I love people. But when people have the unmitigated gall to say that my righteous indignation over the gross miscarriage of justice that allows a monster like Michael Vick back in to the good graces of decent society is racism, it really pisses me off. When you insist that the only reason someone else disagrees with you is because of racism, you are only saying something about yourself. I don't forgive those who torture helpless beings for their own greed or pleasure, whether those beings are animal or human. I don't care about race, religion, age, or ethnicity. Zero tolerance is my creed.

  • D. Auletto

    such a cop out. once again, some moron with a opinion devalues and trivializes actual real racism by playing the race card in defense of someone who would otherwise be indefensible. vick isn't a lowlife because he's black. vick is a lowlife because he's a lowlife. in trying to use race as a defense, you set race relations back, so good for you. be proud of yourself. in the end, though, vick is still a lowlife.

  • Mitchel

    It's NOT a racial issue you bunch of dolts, Vick is a sociopath.

    He never served any time for animal abuse which IS a crime. If it wasn't for his throwing arm he'd be rotting in jail for life like any of us normal people, YOU included!!!!

  • AprilJ

    FYI EVERYONE: Michael Vick was not convicted according the Virginia Animal Cruelty laws. Instead he was indicted in Federal Court and pled guilty to one (1), I repeat, one count of “Conspiracy to Travel in Interstate Commerce in Aid of Unlawful Activities and to Sponsor a Dog in an Animal Fight Venture”. An offense that carries a two to five year sentence. I am going to say this again because it’s important: ‘Vick was sentenced to 23 months and served 18 months’. Again, not quite two years and certainly short of the five year maximum sentence.(from the blog of Chris Durant)

    THIS IS WHY PEOPLE ARE STILL RIGHTFULLY ANGRY, HE DID NO TIME AT ALL FOR ANIMAL CRUELTY AND ABUSE, SO BEFORE SOME PEOPLE ON HERE COMMENT THAT "he did his time let him alone" DO SOME DAMN READING ABOUT WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED NOT THE TWISTED VIEW THAT THE MEDIA SPEWS OUT

  • Karen

    I don't elevate a dog's status over that of a black person, but I certainly would if it was a black person ( or any other color person) that thinks it's okay to torture a living being and finds pleasure in doing so. Trash is as trash does. Hope there is a nice spot in Hell waiting for him.

  • JIrishMac

    So it's okay to abuse and torture dogs; you still get to play in the NFL. Just don't get caught gambling because you will be banned from baseball. I''m sure Pete Rose thinks that's fair!!!

  • Larry

    As a white male, I find it odd that so many white people are posting their opinions posing to be black men or black women. As far as the issue at hand, I use head and shoulders shampoo.

  • G Coleman

    your extremely confused, the vick issue aside. your as brainwashed as they come. did you reread what you just put to print. that was as ignorant a response ive seen on here. alot of self-hate embedded in that mindless drivel. hope you deal with that, have a nice day.

  • G Coleman

    people are so ignorant, black people wont let racism go away bcause its still relevant, and people that say crap like that are ignorant and moronic. Dr, King was assasinated 43 years ago, that aint ancient history. this country was still segregated as hell, wtf are yall talking about? medgar evars, emmit til, hell, james byrd in jasper texas was dragged by a car til his head popped off 10 year ago, a man was stabbing random black people 6 or 7 months ago,but race isnt still an issue? and its deeper then just the actions of lone crazy people, its deeply entrenched in laws, government, and the school systems. shut up, if you feel that way, your useless.

  • gordon

    I predict that Vick will prove again that he is an incorrigible low-life scumbag within the next twelve months. Charlie Sheen can't stop being Charlie Sheen. Michael Vick can't stop being Michael Vick.

  • rhonda

    It is not putting a animal before humans. It is about not being a animal killer, that gets his rocks off by torturing living breathing things. Do you know what a person like Vic, that started with torturing and killing of animals with such glee but never got caught is called…..they are called a serial killers. We are not talking about any other sick individual here we are talking about only one, Michael Vick. Let us deal with one sick person at a time, there are just to many……

  • rhonda

    I hope this paperdid not pay for this article, what a looser, where do they find these people. All those that commented that he paid his debt, probably do not even know the extent of torture and murder he did. This is not just dog fighting this was also torturing and killing animals…..FOR YEARS….in addition to the dog fighting. There is something mentally wrong with someone who does the things he has done. I applaude all those out there that have a soft spot for ANY living creature…..I wish there were more of you out there. I do not care what color his skin is or how rich he is…..this was a horrific thing for anyone to do and if you think otherwise I feel sad for you. His only remorse is that he got caught, maybe this person who tried writting this article could let him borrow their dog. His dogs have been rehabilitated, except for the ones that died or then there is the one that the face is almost completely ripped off, yeah that dog survived…..ignorance is bliss…..