The Black Church vs. Marijuana

July 21st, 2010 - By TheEditor

"Yvette Carnell"It didn’t surprise me when the late C. Delores Tucker and a bevy of Christian leaders mounted a campaign against gangster rap in the mid 1990’s.  Gangster rap was ascending on the music charts just as the genre’s sexually explicit and violent lyrics were deteriorating hip-hop culture.  It wasn’t the viewpoint of C. Delores Tucker and her supporters which disappointed me, but the “us against them” strategy she employed to get their message across.  I thought to myself, those boys you’re vilifying are your sons, grandsons, cousins and brothers.

Not much has changed in the black church since the 1990’s.  Christians still prefer to paint, with broad strokes, a picture of their enemy standing squarely in Satan’s camp, and then bully said enemy into submission with vivid threats of fire and brimstone.

The latest evangelist to pick up the torch and pitchfork is Reverend Ron Allen of the International Faith Based Coalition in California.  He and his ministerial posse have embarked on a campaign to oppose a California initiative which would tax and regulate marijuana.  And wouldn’t you just know it, they are also demonizing NAACP California Branch President Alice Huffman for her support of the ballot measure.

It is not hard to understand why Reverend Allen might be a bit disinclined to acknowledge the need for California lawmakers to relax the penalties against marijuana possession. Rev. Allen’s a recovering crack addict.  He views all drugs through the prism of his addiction.

Rev. Allen has said, “Drugs have no religious preferences.”  True.  Drugs are neutral, but the addiction which robs so many addicts of their will, does have a personality preference.  According to the National Academy of Sciences, addicts are more likely to be impulsive, alienated, stressed and nonconformist.

And just as there are a variety of social pressures and personality traits which drive people to addiction, there are also numerous levels of substance abuse.  Why? Well, to put it quite simply: Not all drugs are created equal.

Although I’ve seen many crack addicts devolve to the point of non-recognition to both family and friends, I’ve yet to hear a doctor speak of crack as a natural cure.  Marijuana, on the other hand, is often used by cancer patients to provide temporary relief from nausea and by AIDS patients to stimulate hunger.  Cannabis is cure. Crack is whack.

Many marijuana smokers are casual users who smoke to relax or socialize. However, you are much more likely to see a crack addict moving heaven and earth to mount a refrigerator atop his back in hopes of selling it for $15 in order to get closer to that next high than you are to see him or her relaxing outside while smoking a “rock” after work.

California’s Proposition 19 would acknowledge this dissimilarity and allow anyone over the age of 21 to possess an ounce of marijuana whereas currently, an ounce of marijuana is punishable by up to six months in jail or a $500 dollar fine.

Reverend Allen’s argument, though flawed, is not void of all merit. For some, abusing marijuana may very well be the doorway through which they delve into other, much more deadly addictions.  For others though, a marijuana drug conviction will be the doorway through which they embark upon a life of crime.

The question Rev. Allen must ask himself is not whether marijuana use is inconsequential, but whether or not any substance abuse should be punishable with jail time. I would ask the reverend, where’s the mercy in such heavy-handed judgment?

He should also consider whether his personal experience provides enough empirical evidence for California to use it as a premise for crafting policy.  If Rev. Allen chose to graduate from marijuana to crack, that was his choice (albeit a poor one).  And his choice probably had more to do with his personality and circumstances than it did the intrinsically nefarious nature of marijuana.

It is time for Rev. Allen and his zealots to step down from their high horse long enough to realize that not all Californians are Christians, and therefore need not abide by Christian principles. It is also true that those who are Christian have vowed to let Jesus be their guide, not Rev. Allen.

In the 1990’s, Christians smashed hip-hop CD’s to prove their point. Now, in 2010, ministers are vilifying proponents of the legalization of marijuana to have their way. Isn’t it time that black, well-meaning Christians asked, what would Jesus do?

Yvette Carnell is a former Capitol Hill Staffer turned political blogger. She currently publishes two blogs, Spatterblog.com and GoGirlGuide.com.

Madame Noire Video

  • Dallas

    I will not waste my time with the over-churched, you have answered brilliantly and after the manner of the Christ, Nikki. After 15 years in a "prominent" mega-ministry I finally decided that I get to choose…andhad thecourageto face my heavenly judges…the church I left. Some challenges in the lives of people are sanctioned by God, the last follower of God that interferred through self-righteousness was Uzza. What happened to him?

  • Eric V. Singleton

    There is a lot or rich discussion going on in response to this debate on "The Black Church vs. Marijuana" and I'm loving exchange. We keep refering to the church and the government as though they were single-minded bodies. In the government and the church, I am sure that every viewpoint shared in our exchange exist in those entities. Are you familiar with Jonathan Edwards' sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God"? At one point during his sermon, he said to his congregation, "I think it is a reasonable thing to fright persons away from hell… Is it not a reasonble thing thing to fright a person out of a house of fire?" Jonathan Edwards was dismmissed by his congregation because his extremist views made them uncomfortable.

    When God inquired of Cain about his brothers whereabouts, Cain's response was "Am I my brother's keeper?" If my brother or sister, and I am refering to all who read this, were about to step into harms way, I would feel remiss if I stayed silent or made made effort to protect them or you from what I perceive as a wrong choice. I may be a "buzz kill" but I don't want anyone to suffer.

    Let's get past the rhetoric, the politics, and the anger and acknowledge the fact that we do need to talk. I have read many of the comments more than once, and I have learned so much from this exchange. I'm not part of any religious conspiracy, but I do care about what you think and how you live. We all need to stand up for something. We all need to paticipate in the process because we are our churches, our government, and commnunities. As a society, the worst thing we can do as individuals is take a posture of indifference. Like everyone who has taken the time to comment on this particular issue, I am my brother's keeper.

  • Richard Brown

    In response to Mr. Singleton, how many of these graveyards contain people who have died of marijuana overdose? Answer: None. As for the idea that marijuana leads to other drugs: The main reason for this is that marijuana users are have to buy it from drug dealers who often trade in other substances.

  • Universal Divine Bei

    Thank you Yvette Carnell for posting this.

  • Universal Divine Bei

    Come Now, Lets All of us reason together.

    Religions do not pay taxes. Correct.

    Why don't they? It is Political. Politics controls Religion and Hollywood.

    Religion, Politics, and Hollywood, are all Bedfellows.

    There are people religion who smoke Marijuana. They know the dealers on the street who have runners to bring Marijuana to them, and same for the below.

    There are people in Politics who smoke Marijuana.

    There are countless people in Hollywood who smokes Marijuana.

    Do anyone know what G13 is? It is Government Grown Marijuana. So who is testing it when it is grown? Why is it Government Grown? Where does it go after it is Grown? Do they keep it amongst themselves?

    If we desire to know who smoke Marijuana, ask a Dealer.

    Each one, Religion, Politics, and Hollywood have another thing in common. Crime.

    I say Light The Marijuana up All over this earth, so Peace can rule and reign in the mind-set on/in earth.

    Vision this. I mean truly Vision, close your eyes and take your mind into a war zone, soldiers fighting each other in different countries.

    Does this make sense?

    Have several Planes like Crop Dusting Planes Sprays over fields, have Crop Dusting palanes Spray the smoke from Marijuna over all the areas the soldiers are fighting and do it for a week. What can we expect to see? Once the soldiers on both sides of the war get a week worth of this Maijuana Smoke and perhaps before the week is out, say a week, they inhale the smoke, we can See soldiers dropping their weapons on both sides. With the Marijuana affect on them, they will be hugging, smiling, balanced with each other to include their oppositions. How do we know this will not work? Has it been tried Yet? Condemnation without investigation, is the Ultimate ignorance. (Einstien).

    The Soldiers Blood, the Generals/Pastor/Reverends…and the likes of name, will not allow what I shared to happen among the soldiers, because it is flesh and blood the Generals/Pastors/Reverends and the Warmongers Loves. Like Michael Jackson said: They do not care about us/soldiers. If they did they would use all means to bring about Harmony everywhere instead of disharmony.

    I hate evil with a Passion. If we all do not, then we love evil.

  • Eric V. Singleton

    A rafter caught in my eye – what a gruesome analogy. I think the reverend, the person I responded to, you, and I are just people exercising our right to have different opinions. I think before I speak, I say exactly what I mean, and try to live my life without being too offensive or making apologies. I can't speak for the reverend, but that's who I am.

  • mirandb

    well….then when does your personal preference negat the last guys who u replied too?

    it doest.

    least that guy was saying it SHOULD be open to peoples choice. but u, like most radical christians arent happy with not taking charge of anothers personal life. U said his opinion doesnt negate yours….but u lacked any respect for him expressing his open opinion which didnt force any view or judgemnt on anyone. it was just simply that we should let each man decide for himself…u kind of killed your point snapping back at his reply the way u did.

    and even worse was that u u claimed ealier that some ppl need to be saved from themselves. Really? and any so called preacher with biased views and closeminded opinions is the right person to save others from themselve? Even if the misiter was all about legallizing weed, two main concerns come up:

    #1, the church and the stae should be seperate so a man living by the word of god should know better than to try to use his religious stance and prominence to try to suade the governemtn or anyone else. He can teach others to inform them what he belives, but going all out to try to force one to do somethign with religious force makes him no better than the idividuals who particpated in the Crusades so many years ago.

    and #2:we are all imperfect, and all fallshort of where we should be. Correct? So really….who are you or that reverand to point out the straw in their brothers eye, when indeed their is a rafter caught in yours?

  • Steph

    This is an excellent piece. I appreciate your respectful dissent, your consideration of everybody's point of view concerning this controversial issue, and your ability to establish a link between the two sides. Thank you! I will definitely share this with others.

  • TaxAndControl2010

    Learn more about the campaign to legalize, control, and tax cannabis in California at http://www.taxcannabis.org. And become a fan of the campaign on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/taxcannabis. Thanks!

  • Mojo

    Your opinion is well stated. As a Christian, I do think we tend to force OUR views on others. This article has sparked a great discussion with friends and family.