The Peculiar Case of African-American World Cup Watching

June 22nd, 2010 - By TheEditor

Dr. Dumi LewisEvery four years, I suffer from a condition. I feel confused, disconnected from friends and co-workers, yet strangely compelled to engage foreign matters. These feelings are brought on by the arrival of the World Cup.  Through conversations with a number of my black American friends I’ve learned that I am not alone in this sentiment.  While the World Cup represents one of the most important events to take place around the globe, it remains far from sacred to Americans; even less so to many black Americans.

I recognize that the World Cup is very significant to many of my brothers and sisters throughout the African diaspora, but I wonder if it will ever hold deep meaning for most of us.  While it may just seem like a sporting event, mending our disconnection from the World Cup holds great promise for African-Americans; learning to appreciate it could usher in a new period of global citizenship.

As I recently sat watching the United States v. England match someone asked, “Who are you rooting for?”  “Neither!  I don’t like colonizers or oppressors,”  I responded.  Off the cuff, I quickly realized that my comment spoke to a dilemma the sport presents to many black people in this country.  My disengagement with the World Cup wasn’t just about politics, it was also about how I was socialized.

In the United States soccer is an overwhelmingly middle class, suburban and predominantly white activity.  Images of plush green fields, orange slices and minivans rush to my mind when I hear the word soccer.

By contrast, around the world, children mired in poverty find football, as the majority of the world calls it, an ideal athletic outlet.  Whether it is played on the plush fields of London or the dusty expanses of Dakar, soccer is a language for communication and competition.  Sadly, it is an international language from which many black Americans have been barred.

Sports are not foreign to black Americans, but over the years there has been a continued narrowing of sporting options.  Sports like hockey and golf attract few black youth because of their high costs.  But soccer is economically accessible, so if it’s not about the money, then what’s the problem?

Sociologist Scott Brooks finds that black youth, particularly boys, are socialized heavily toward basketball.  While many try to argue that black boys are naturally talented at hoops and view it as their only option out of poverty, neither could be further from the truth.  We have the potential to excel at any sport, but outside factors have shaped our interests and abilities over time.  Need proof? Look no further than the declining presence of African-Americans in baseball.  The messages we pass and the opportunities we present dictate the paths that we take to recreation and beyond.  While there are many barriers to linking black Americans to the globe, such as poverty, segregation and unequal access to technology, soccer could provide an alternative path to connection.

I began watching the World Cup when my friends from college began pestering me to check it out.  I wasn’t completely unexposed, having been the lone black kid on a handful of soccer teams growing up.  But I didn’t realize the global importance of the Cup, particularly to the African diaspora.  As anthropologist Michael Ralph has pointed out, in places like Senegal soccer is often about more than simple sport — it represents historical and contemporary political battlegrounds.  I am slowly coming into an appreciation for the World Cup, not just as a sport, but also as an opportunity to foster camaraderie throughout the diaspora.  The work of uniting the diaspora doesn’t have to be limited to politics and protest.  It can also be linked in play.

R. L’Heureux Lewis is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and Black Studies at the City College of New York – CUNY. His research concentrates on issues of educational inequality, the role of race in contemporary society, and mental health well-being.

Madame Noire Video

Comment Disclaimer

Comments that contain profane or derogatory language, video links or exceed 200 words will require approval by a moderator before appearing in the comment section. XOXO-MN

  • tink tans

    the rest of the world says football- this is your problem here!

  • Jim

    hahahahah … This dude still thinks he's in grad school doing research papers!! Most things in life, my friend, are not this convoluted. I could write a long response to this and try to explain to you why you are being way too deep. Instead I will just say that you are a horrible journalist and sound like one of those bigots who eat up everything jesse jackson says.

  • Lilias

    You are way over-thinking this. Soccer is a sport. You either like it or you don't. Most Americans have little to no interest in soccer, especially global soccer, for a number of reasons. The highest on that list is probably because it is seen as a children's sport with no future. Major League Soccer does have some fans but not nearly the same following nor media coverage as American football or basketball. From doing a little actual research I discovered that professional, organized soccer (Major League Soccer) in this country was founded in 1993 and they've only been playing since 1996. That's 14 years. I'm older than MLS and I'm only 24 years old.

    The league hasn't really gotten it's feet in American society. The NFL has been around since 1920 and versions of American football had been played since the mid-1800s. The NBA has been around in some capacity since 1946.

    You have to think of all the angles. You can't just say "African Americans think soccer sucks because of white oppression and socialization". NO ONE sees MLS as a gateway to fame and fortune. Not white people, not black people, not anyone. Basketball and football are the most popular sports in this country. Who wouldn't want to be a part of that?

    What I don't understand is why it is ok in your opinion that other countries can so closely identify with soccer as a sport for their country but it's weird that Americans identify with American football and basketball.

    I'm an African American woman and I don't care for sports at all, in any capacity. Does that mean I've been socialized in some heteronormative, prejudiced societal structuring of my life in that because I am both African American and female that the White Man has told me that I can't play sports and shouldn't be interested or even try?

    Ahem, no. I don't care for sports and never have. I played sports in school. I played sports outside of school. I don't like them. And it has nothing to do with white people or colonization or oppression. I just plain don't like sports.

  • Natalie

    Good commentary!

    A few thoughts:

    I think soccer/football may have become raced and classed in the contemporary (i.e. post 1990s) U.S., which is rather curious since most kids learn to kick a ball-like thing, long before they can actually hold, let alone dribble or throw it. It makes me more than sad when I see the amazing skill of the kids on the fields in my neighborhood, where I go twice a week to watch and coach. I hope they don't get turned off from the sport because they somehow come to believe that black kids are not supposed to play, let alone be good at, football.

    But, what's interesting is that your commentary strongly suggests that African Americans ' disinterest in soccer has more to do with American nationalism than anything else: [American] football and basketball were labelled as "American" sports a long time ago and that's what American people identify with, as well as what is exported as American culture to the rest of the world. Curiously, most of the world uses the term "football" to describe the sport, but the term has had to be qualified, or explicitly rejected in the US because the term "football" has been appropriated by and is now seen as belonging to Americans; in drawing the line and assigning a distinct term, "soccer" is somehow made to seem foreign. But who's kidding who really? What is called football in the U.S. more resembles rugby than anything else. Football is played with feet, not with hands. So, to me, to co-opt the term "football" for a sport that doesn't even resemble the original is merely another example of American arrogance. I'd love to find out more about the origin of the American sport and how the powers that be have dealt with this question though.

    It's also fascinating that throughout the African diaspora, you can find young people, primarily men but not always, rejecting soccer for the more "global" sport of basketball (indeed, is there any place in the world that does not have a basketball team or where the term basketball is not uttered with a faraway glow in the eyes?) After all, AfAm culture is often telegraphed around the world as evidence of how black people are engaging with modernity and progress in both positive and negative ways. Basketball is part of that story, and is what many young people prefer, especially if they aspire to migrate to the U.S. and hope to be picked for a college or professional team; it's a ticket to the land of opportunity.

    Even young women in the Caribbean are being taught to see basketball as a version of netball, a predominantly women's sport, with the hopes of using the sport as a ticket to social mobility. Teaching football to girls is not on the agenda, however.

    Likewise, the occasional media reports on AfAm folks doing volunteer or other charity work abroad confirms this identification with basketball as an "American" phenomenon where the photo ops and work with youth seem to revolve around showing kids the moves and creating basketball courts and camps, not establishing decent fields for playing football.

    And, like it or not, Obama certainly has helped to shore up the world's identification of basketball as distinctly "African American", and which also further demarcates football as something only black people from other parts of the world engage in. In my more cynical moments, globalization of basketball is an interesting dimension of the neoliberal order; I don't study sports so I don't know who's writing about this. I do think that the heightened visibility of basketball certainly gives the appearance that Americans, including African Americans, do not need to speak any other sports language, since everyone else will eventually learn theirs.

    There's certainly no requirement that AfAm know about or identify with the cultural practices of all other black people (I know, I know…) but understanding the borders and boundaries that prevent or at least hinder the possibilities of identification is well worth discussing. At the very least, there's no need to invalidate or denigrate those cultural practices as the responses by "Black American" seems intent on doing.

    And, since play is always informed by politics, there's no reason why we can't be the ones to create and forge the politics that serve our own interests.

  • Nappy Vagabond Wande

    And nappy (for the Euros) is not a diaper. It's a hair texture and it means kinky or curly.

  • count_schemula

    Whatever dude. Protest your days away. Good luck with that. The rest of the world is getting about it, without you.

  • Ray

    "African diaspora"? It would be diaspora if referring to African Americans, but not people still living in their native land.

    • MeMe

      The African Diaspora refers to ALL people of African descent whether they are away or at home~ the physical location is irrelevant!

  • Dcgal

    This is just another way in which " broth as" need to grow and expand.

  • http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com Ron Mwangaguhunga

    As a Ugandan-born African American, I could give a dman about basketball. Go Ghana!

  • futbol fan

    it's a sport mate.. either your in to it or your not.

    …and just in case you didn't know, there are plenty of African-American males that do not care for basketball; What a concept!